It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
It takes literally about 5 seconds to find a whole mess of crap that rubbishes the method of DNA testing that was used as well.
Yes I'm sure ... thats why it is used by every police and law enforcment agency on the planet, thats the reason for CODIS, and its other country counterparts. That would also be the reason that it is admitted as evidence in nearly all courts of law. Its just pure trash...
Er, you clearly have indian in you somewhere otherwise the results would have pointed to somewhere else. And you do know that it is possible that your family tree could be correct, and that the indian part of it came into play earlier than 600+ years ago, right?
Just how is that? My terrestrial family tree goes back to before 1550, I didn't know England had been to India that early.
For what its worth ... if the results has been in conformance with the family tree, I would have shut-up and gone away. But, as long as there is an anonaly ... I gotta ask more questions.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Yes I'm sure ... thats why it is used by every police and law enforcment agency on the planet, thats the reason for CODIS, and its other country counterparts. That would also be the reason that it is admitted as evidence in nearly all courts of law. Its just pure trash...
Just how is that? My terrestrial family tree goes back to before 1550, I didn't know England had been to India that early.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Why do the indian gene's need to be mixed directly with english one's?
Haplogroups go back thousands of years, so depending on how far back you go its not hard to imagine that indian DNA could be mixed in there.
This idea is even more plausible when you consider that it was your Y chromosome that was analysed. i.e. that DNA would be passed from father to son. And back in the day when women knew their place in the world it was the men who did all the cool exploration stuff.. and so more likely to come across opportunities to spread their seed & whatnot.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
Now I'm presenting the first of some harder scientific evidence in the form of an autosomal DNA profile.
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
My Terrestrial family tree has been traced back some 600 years...no evidence of anyone from India
600 years = 20 generations
2^20 Generations = 1048576 sources
Understanding DNA series
The Gypsy people originally came from India and migrated to Europe more than 2000 years ago from the Hindu Kush area of Western India and Pakistan. A community of these Gypsies was said to exist in central Virginia.
DNA (testing) has revealed that 15% of birth certificates identify the wrong man as the father of a child.
www.authorsden.com...
Originally posted by LiveForever8
AnthraAndromeda is not an alien.
Why is he here, was he an outcast?
What is his purpose?
Originally posted by AnthraAndromda
If we take my terrestrial father's side of the family tree; it traces directly to 1500's Scottish Royalty. And in their world no "bastard son" is going to be recognized, regardless of his father. He probably wouldn't even be allow to pass along the family name. But be that as it may, such a bastard does not exist in my human family line, so ... the presence of Indian is unusual. It doesn't belong there IF I am Human. Further, there is no linkage to ANY European population in my DNA, again rather unusual, and quite unexpected.
Honestly, I expected the analysis to show that I was a solid Scot/English person, and this whole discussion would be over, but, alas, I don't get anything easy.
Originally posted by Kailassa
Originally posted by LiveForever8
AnthraAndromeda is not an alien.
Why is he here, was he an outcast?
What is his purpose?
Possibly to drum up interest in his own web site.
For some reason he didn't include a scan of the report he claims to have, on his site which he linked to.
Neither did he provide any evidence that the numbers on what he claims to be his CODIS chart prove anything about his ancestry.
Originally posted by Kailassa
reply to post by AnthraAndromda
You are assuming a family tree gives accurate info regarding which males sired which children. For all you know your mother had it off with an Indian. There are Indians with pale skin who can easily pass as Caucasian.
DNA (testing) has revealed that 15% of birth certificates identify the wrong man as the father of a child.
www.authorsden.com...
Seriously, what's more likely, your mother had an affair with a man of Indian descent, or she managed to get impregnated by aliens?
Are you interested in the logical truth?
Or are you determined to cling to a feelgood myth that makes you "special"?
Originally posted by Bluebelle
Thats just how it works, some genes get passed on and some dont. There's so many opportunities where other DNA can get mixed in that just because you can trace 500 years back doesnt mean those are the genes that you will inherit. And if you werent a human then they wouldnt be able to trace your genes back to any of these populations. If I sent my cat for a human DNA analysis I wouldnt get a letter back saying that its a descendant of native indians.
Originally posted by LiveForever8
AnthraAndromeda is not an alien.
Why is he here, was he an outcast?
What is his purpose?
To come on a conspiracy website to 'reveal' all of his 'secrets'?
Please!
Come on people, I love reading these things, but when people take them seriously I get worried.
Common sense, ever heard of it? It has become a contradiction in terms.
Evidence or leave.