Teacher suspended for article on gay animals

reply to post by Common Good


I looked at your profile before putting you on the F list. The Carlin thread almost helped, but then I saw the 'birther' malarkey, and the button got pushed....Likewise, though!

Best,
Skunknuts

Even though this is a case of " Way Too Much Information". He should not get suspended for it, ... I mean, its a valid scientific phenomenon.


It would be different if under the assignment he applied a lipstick kiss and his phone number on the paper.

reply to post by skunknuts


oooooh k.
Well more power to you than.

BTW-Did you even watch the video? Or did you just start hating because it was George Carlin?

And the "birther" issue.
Im not a "birther"...However, That does not mean that I am not willing to support their movement.
I do support their movement, and if there is anything that I could ever do to contribute to the slaying of a usuper...well than count me all in.

here is the problem, he should of used THIS as his teaching tool...it covers animals, sex, protection, homosexual behavior AND humor!!!



[edit on 12/28/2009 by rcwj1975]

Originally posted by Common Good
reply to post by skunknuts

 

oooooh k.
Well more power to you than.

BTW-Did you even watch the video? Or did you just start hating because it was George Carlin?

And the "birther" issue.
Im not a "birther"...However, That does not mean that I am not willing to support their movement.
I do support their movement, and if there is anything that I could ever do to contribute to the slaying of a usuper...well than count me all in.

I said the Carlin video HELPED your cause, but it was the birther stuff that put you on the foe list....

So your not a birther, but you support their cause; I sure hope you weren't supporting the same people who held-up 'Sore-Loserman' signs in Florida, if you want any credibility in the 'fighting usurpation' department.


Best,
Skunknuts

reply to post by skunknuts


ROFLMAO- So I am your foe because I support a group of people that you do not? Now that is funny.

Wanna know what else is funny?
Anytime I post something in one of these "gay" threads..
No matter what I say, even if it has a logical point against homosexuality...I get a foe.

Thing about the gay community, they want you to open your mind up, but if its not open to the way they view things, then all of the sudden you are on a hit list.

Thats why I stopped posting in those threads.

This thread, however, IMO is not only about the gay agenda(which I believe it is) but its about teaching this stuff to children.
Thats why I came in here to say what I had to say.
I made a foe because of it, oh well.
Glad you could join the club =)

Originally posted by Common Good
reply to post by skunknuts

 

ROFLMAO- So I am your foe because I support a group of people that you do not? Now that is funny.

Wanna know what else is funny?
Anytime I post something in one of these "gay" threads..
No matter what I say, even if it has a logical point against homosexuality...I get a foe.

Thing about the gay community, they want you to open your mind up, but if its not open to the way they view things, then all of the sudden you are on a hit list.

Thats why I stopped posting in those threads.

This thread, however, IMO is not only about the gay agenda(which I believe it is) but its about teaching this stuff to children.
Thats why I came in here to say what I had to say.
I made a foe because of it, oh well.
Glad you could join the club =)

There you go again. I'm not part of the 'gay community,' so your ASSumptions are already defunct before even passing go.

BTW, what exactly do you mean by the statement 'slaying a usurper?'

Best,
Skunknuts

reply to post by skunknuts


Never said you were part of the gay community, I said Everytime I come into one of these "gay threads" I always end up getting a foe because I dont believe in the same things they do.

ok.
slaying the usurper..... taking out a person of office that doesnt have the constitutional right to hold office.

But now we are getting off topic. =)
So I will leave you with this last post.

reply to post by rainfall

a teacher at Southwestern High School

*shrug* High School.

Sure the teacher probably had an agenda. But by high school I think it's reasonable to expect kids to be mature enough to make their own decisions about these things. If you raise your kids to be so spineless that they'll adopt the belief systems of the first person who shows up...whose fault is that?



[edit on 28-12-2009 by LordBucket]

This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching them something they will never need to know or use in life. (Unless they are having sex with animals in Southern Illinois which wouldn't suprise me lol). But I have a feeling there is a subtle sociopolitical agenda to this teachers assignment. If we must remove religion from the school system, I think we gotta do the same with politics, beliefs, and lifestyles. Prohibit all teachers from discussing anything besides the subjects they are supposed to teach would be a good start.

2 Peter 2:1
'But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies'.

reply to post by Moonman1111

This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching
them something they will never need to know or use in life.

That describes the vast majority of everything taught in public schools.

I really don't see what the 'big deal' is about.....

It's high school students learning about things that naturally take place in nature...

Originally posted by rainfall
I really don't see what the 'big deal' is about.....

It's high school students learning about things that naturally take place in nature...

Yeah, but who says kids should be exposed to the radical nature agenda.

Best,
Skunknuts

Originally posted by Moonman1111
This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching them something they will never need to know or use in life. (Unless they are having sex with animals in Southern Illinois which wouldn't suprise me lol). But I have a feeling there is a subtle sociopolitical agenda to this teachers assignment. If we must remove religion from the school system, I think we gotta do the same with politics, beliefs, and lifestyles. Prohibit all teachers from discussing anything besides the subjects they are supposed to teach would be a good start.

2 Peter 2:1
'But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies'.

If you want us to all live under your brand of Sharia Law, you are in the wrong country. Equating the removal of state-taught religious dogma to the teaching of politics, sociology, etc--how absolutely absurd.

A better analogy would be saying that if the bible can't be taught in the public school system, neither should other fictional literature.

Best,
Skunknuts

Originally posted by Moonman1111
This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching them something they will never need to know or use in life.

They can and will use the information if they are ever in a debate with an ignorant person claiming homosexuality is not a natural behavior, as it demonstrably is.

But I have a feeling there is a subtle sociopolitical agenda to this teachers assignment. If we must remove religion from the school system, I think we gotta do the same with politics, beliefs, and lifestyles.

Only facts were being offered. The political agenda you suspect is solely your own political agenda of demonizing homosexuality as something unnatural and disgraceful to your god. Religion has ALREADY been kicked out of school, so keep that to yourself. You are still free to teach your own children to be bigots.

Originally posted by skunknuts

Originally posted by Moonman1111
This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching them something they will never need to know or use in life. (Unless they are having sex with animals in Southern Illinois which wouldn't suprise me lol). But I have a feeling there is a subtle sociopolitical agenda to this teachers assignment. If we must remove religion from the school system, I think we gotta do the same with politics, beliefs, and lifestyles. Prohibit all teachers from discussing anything besides the subjects they are supposed to teach would be a good start.

2 Peter 2:1
'But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies'.

If you want us to all live under your brand of Sharia Law, you are in the wrong country. Equating the removal of state-taught religious dogma to the teaching of politics, sociology, etc--how absolutely absurd.

A better analogy would be saying that if the bible can't be taught in the public school system, neither should other fictional literature.

Best,
Skunknuts

Wow, equating the notion that schools need to stick to academic studies alone to Sharia law seems a little extreme don't you think? Schools should not be playgrounds for adults who want to play puppet master or share their own personal views on anything not relating to academic studies. Sure if this was college it could be considered an abstract assignment, but it is a public high school ran by tax payers money. As a Christian I can say, not even religion should be taught in public high schools. Also on a side note about the validity of the subject he made the students do, animals do not build glory holes, animals do not have lisps etc etc

Originally posted by rainfall
I really don't see what the 'big deal' is about.....

It's high school students learning about things that naturally take place in nature...

The problem is you can't brainwash animals with a bunch of rhetoric, they do what they do naturally, and Christians don't like that at all.

Originally posted by bsbray11

Originally posted by Moonman1111
This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching them something they will never need to know or use in life.

They can and will use the information if they are ever in a debate with an ignorant person claiming homosexuality is not a natural behavior, as it demonstrably is.

But I have a feeling there is a subtle sociopolitical agenda to this teachers assignment. If we must remove religion from the school system, I think we gotta do the same with politics, beliefs, and lifestyles.

Only facts were being offered. The political agenda you suspect is solely your own political agenda of demonizing homosexuality as something unnatural and disgraceful to your god. Religion has ALREADY been kicked out of school, so keep that to yourself. You are still free to teach your own children to be bigots.

I'm sorry, I didn't know arming students well children with this kind of material on the tax payers penny would have a good and constructive use in their future in a heated debate where one can claim apes have gay sex so its ok for humans to do it to. It's natural! Nothing more natural than injecting semen into another mans colon! Actually is sounds more like obsessive compulsive sexual fetish disorder. Also it seems homosexuals now want children to fight their political battles for them now or in the near future, is that what you are suggesting? Facts huh? I can pull out so many facts involving homosexuals your head would spin.

Originally posted by Moonman1111

Originally posted by bsbray11

Originally posted by Moonman1111
This 'teacher' has wasted tax dollars and students time by teaching them something they will never need to know or use in life.

They can and will use the information if they are ever in a debate with an ignorant person claiming homosexuality is not a natural behavior, as it demonstrably is.

But I have a feeling there is a subtle sociopolitical agenda to this teachers assignment. If we must remove religion from the school system, I think we gotta do the same with politics, beliefs, and lifestyles.

Only facts were being offered. The political agenda you suspect is solely your own political agenda of demonizing homosexuality as something unnatural and disgraceful to your god. Religion has ALREADY been kicked out of school, so keep that to yourself. You are still free to teach your own children to be bigots.

I'm sorry, I didn't know arming students well children with this kind of material on the tax payers penny would have a good and constructive use in their future in a heated debate where one can claim apes have gay sex so its ok for humans to do it to. It's natural! Nothing more natural than injecting semen into another mans colon! Actually is sounds more like obsessive compulsive sexual fetish disorder. Also it seems homosexuals now want children to fight their political battles for them now or in the near future, is that what you are suggesting? Facts huh? I can pull out so many facts involving homosexuals your head would spin.

So, you are against teaching sociology, biology, and psychology in high schools because they are not 'academic' subjects? WTF? Do I even need to state how oxymoronic that statement is? But, I want to focus on something else--

For some reason, you seem to have come-up with a diagnosis of 'obsessive compulsive sexual fetish disorder' for people who prefer sexual relations with same gendered individuals. Now, I find it interesting that you are throwing around diagnosis, especially when you don't consider such fields 'academic.'

However, what I find REALLY ironic is that the character traits of which your words belie have been WELL studied in a systematic and valid manner. Most likely, the venom you spew towards homosexuals, says MUCH MUCH more about you than any mis-characterized pseudo-diagnostic labels you spew onto others. The language you use when discussing this topic, the imagery you draw-up, all points into a direction that to most people with any psychological training and insight can see rather clearly. If I had to label you, i would use your own diagnosis that you are SO clearly projecting onto others....

Now, having deviant and obsessive sexual thoughts (I, mind you, am not judging, as that is your realm), it is clear to see how your mind is trying to deal with such a threatening (to your super-ego) reality. With someone who lives in such a thick hut of denial, it is clear why you seethe at the mouth with a rabid fear of the thought of people, in general, becoming educated and aware of such topics.

I'm just guessing, but the fundamentalist militant (Christianity in your mind), is most likely, while a committed one, just your most recent phase of dogma. I'll bet if we could get an honest look at your past actions and thoughts, we could see that much of your vitriol is really directed right at yourself.

While you are currently fooling yourself, and maybe a committed group of people sharing similar psyches, the problem with denial is that it never works forever. But again, you are the one judging, if anything, I feel bad that if you continue along your path, you most likely will have a personal fall similar to the Haggards and Foleys of the world.

It's not too late, though. If you can commit yourself to pursuing truth and acceptance, of yourself and others, you can still live a fulfilling and decent existence. If you aren't fooling me, you certainly aren't, truly, fooling yourself, and you definitely are not fooling an omniscient omnipresent supreme being. You need to learn to love all of God's creations, especially, and most difficultly, yourself. Good luck.

Best,
Skunknuts

reply to post by skunknuts




You shall not lie with a male as with a woman. It is an abomination. Leviticus 18:22

If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them.
Leviticus 20:13