It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by downisreallyup
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by felonius
If the world wants to agree NOW that this policy of no land disputes is how things will be done, then fine... and that goes for all the big guys too, like the USA, Russia, China, etc. Remember, Israel ALREADY gave back the Sinai Peninsula, which they also won fair and square in a war. Why should they have to do what no other victorious country has had to do? Show me ONE OTHER country that has EVER given back land that they won in a war. I'd be interested to see you try.
Hmmm
West germany (US/UK) back to the germans
East germany(soviet) back to germany.
Half of the british empire back to the native population (India, South Africa, Kenya, Tanganyika renamed Tanzania, Rhodesia renamed Zimbabwe etc etc etc
Hong kong to the chinese.
Unless you want to be pendantic and state that taking over a country with vastly superior forces is not war.
With Isreal you also forget that there are UN resolutions which makes their actions illegal. However they get away with it due to US support.
Originally posted by thedeadtruth
reply to post by mmiichael
For all the words that come out of your keyboard, you still can not or will not answer my question......
Do you believe God favors and made promises to one race of people over all others.
YES or NO
Whats wrong, you worried the answer will expose you for what you truly are ? A bigot.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
I love history Michael as you well know. You can learn so much from it. Let’s fast forward 36 years to the early 1980’s and check back in with those crazed rabid anti-Semitic pseudo intellectual CIA folks again educated at those disreputable universities like Harvard and Yale and all there crazy conspiracy theories shall we?
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Mostly I chose to illustrate these things to display to any and all the real difference between a Jew, the noble woman on the hunger strike to highlight the plight of Gaza Palestinians and Zionists who would rather seize such opportunities to spread the propaganda of war and hate and religious xenophobia for the sake of power and greed.
You did an excellent job at helping me to highlight the differences between the two, and I thank you for that Michael!
After all, I do have you on my friends list for a reason!
Originally posted by mmiichael
There are billions of people in the world. What some probably senile 85 year old Jewish woman says or does is anecdotal and inconsequential. It represents nothing except a minor human interest bit of fluff.
Try reading and placing in perspective accounts of a few million adolescent girls in North Africa and the Middle East - rape, mutilation, torture, disease, death. That is representative of something happening.
There are billions of people in the world. What some probably senile 85 year old Jewish woman says or does is anecdotal and inconsequential. It represents nothing except a minor human interest bit of fluff.
Originally posted by Sean48
But as soon as Zionist, Israel, Gaza, Mossad, etc are in the subject they attract the same ol' haters and lamebrains. Who have nothing to contribute except their venom, bile, angst, outrage, etc.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Sometimes fools rush in Michael were cowards and brave men alike fear to tread. Discretion is the better part of valor. Those with no honor die in shame, and those who live by the sword perish by it.
As you have laboriously pointed out in detail - all Muslims are victims of Jewish plotting and conniving somehow.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
No my friend Michael what I said was that the CIA as early as 1947 prior to Israeli independence opined that the creation of an Israeli State in the Middle East would ultimately lead to circumstances and situations where reasoned Arab Statesmen would be supplanted by “Chauvinists and Religious Radicals.”