The forces of Climate protection are reaching new heights of insanity in the wake of the Copenhagen Climate Conference.
"Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living" by New Zealanders Robert and Brenda Vale is back in the news. Yeah, I know this was
covered a few months ago in another
Thread but, it looks like the MSM are dragging
this story back out in the wake of the Copenhagen Climate Conference.
Polluting pets: the devastating impact of man's best
friend
PARIS (AFP) – Man's best friend could be one of the environment's worst enemies, according to a new study which says the carbon pawprint of a pet
dog is more than double that of a gas-guzzling sports utility vehicle.
But the revelation in the book "Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living" by New Zealanders Robert and Brenda Vale has angered pet
owners who feel they are being singled out as troublemakers.
"Owning a dog really is quite an extravagance, mainly because of the carbon footprint of meat," Barrett said.
Other animals aren't much better for the environment, the Vales say.
Cats have an eco-footprint of about 0.15 hectares, slightly less than driving a Volkswagen Golf for a year, while two hamsters equates to a plasma
television and even the humble goldfish burns energy equivalent to two mobile telephones.
But Reha Huttin, president of France's 30 Million Friends animal rights foundation says the human impact of eliminating pets would be equally
devastating.
"Pets are anti-depressants, they help us cope with stress, they are good for the elderly," Huttin told AFP.
"Everyone should work out their own environmental impact. I should be allowed to say that I walk instead of using my car and that I don't eat meat,
so why shouldn't I be allowed to have a little cat to alleviate my loneliness?"
Sylvie Comont, proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- says defiantly, "Our animals give
us so much that I don't feel like a polluter at all.
"I think the love we have for our animals and what they contribute to our lives outweighs the environmental considerations.
"I don't want a life without animals," she told AFP.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
They're not just sticking to the 'carbon footprint" argument either. Vales is declaring all out war on all pets, saying they are an environmental
disaster.
And pets' environmental impact is not limited to their carbon footprint, as cats and dogs devastate wildlife, spread disease and pollute waterways,
the Vales say.
With a total 7.7 million cats in Britain, more than 188 million wild animals are hunted, killed and eaten by feline predators per year, or an average
25 birds, mammals and frogs per cat, according to figures in the New Scientist.
Likewise, dogs decrease biodiversity in areas they are walked, while their faeces cause high bacterial levels in rivers and streams, making the water
unsafe to drink, starving waterways of oxygen and killing aquatic life.
And cat poo can be even more toxic than doggy doo -- owners who flush their litter down the toilet ultimately infect sea otters and other animals with
toxoplasma gondii, which causes a killer brain disease.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
Vales recommends we eat our pets after they pass away in order to compensate for their environmental impact.
This guy needs to get his head examined.
This article points out how proposed environmental lagislation would impact every aspect of out lives. Every thing we do, every choice we make will
give the environmentalist wackos another excuse to impose yet another tax on our already overtaxed lives.
All for some made-up BS science which ignores natural climate fluctuation.