Deuteronilus Mensae Doors, Entry Ways ?

Great find

Just checked on google earth, its definately there! And artificial, they are damn-near identical!

S/F, good work.

Google Earth, Mars section.

Coords are posted in the op.

Good Luck.

Mob

reply to post by LightWonder


Thanks for your comments, glad to get the independant check.

So hoax is now crossed out!

Mob

reply to post by marsorbust


Excellent find!

These are obviously intelligently created artificial objects.

Very, very interesting stuff, well done.

reply to post by Genetix


Thanks Genetix,

I'm glad you liked the find.

Definitely different!

Mob

Wow, it's actually there....I'm gonna go ahead and let myself get excited about this.

Considering they are both on the join between two images, and considering the way they look, I guess that they are just some problems with the images.

I have to look for more images of that area.

Eight or nine miles? And it's been confirmed to actually be on Google Mars?

What is this feeling I'm having -- I can't recognize it. Oh! I remember -- it's excitement. The kind that comes from an actual find instead of playing the game of how many people can I fool with a hoax!

Well, given the approximate distance between the two doors, it's fairly safe to say that there is probably something pretty massive in there if they are connected.

It looks like the entrance ways to the coal mines and drug smuggling tunnels. I wonder if someone / something has found a way to mine Mars?

Since there doesn't appear to be any kind of actual door -- meaning a closing structure or something to block the entrance or prevent others from entering -- they look open to me judging by the shadows -- I would say it's fairly recent. Seems to be little or no decaying, no destruction, they look pretty intact and well preserved.

This really looks really real!
Nice find!

reply to post by lpowell0627


You know its funny that you used the word coal mine, that's exactly what they looked like to me. I spent some years working in one and the main deep entrance is very similar in shape.

Mob

Originally posted by marsorbust
Google Earth, Mars section.

Coords are posted in the op.

Good Luck.

Mob

Mob
Check me on this. Found another site maybe 50 miles north of your find located at lat= 45°56'53.70"N and lon= 23°32'19.17"E

reply to post by intothelight


That's the one on the left in the original posting.

Keep looking though, you never know.

Mob

OK, higher resolution photos show nothing.

The northern-most area
(click for full size)


And the other
(click for full size)


PS: I think I got the right area. Both images are from photo P04_002468_2257_XI_45N336W taken by Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter context camera. The resolution is 6.12 metres per pixel.

reply to post by ArMaP


Well Armap, it looks to me like you are comparing apples to oranges.

I do appreciate your looking, but they are two different images taken in two different methods. The grayscale is probably a red frame. Going by that method and the number of dust storms since the original was taken, it wouldn't rule out the earlier image. Also I would like to see another image using the exact same method as the original. One mustn't forget the face of Mars is subject to change, and because of that, I wouldn't be too quick to rule out the op image.

Mob

spelling edit

[edit on 21/12/09 by marsorbust]

It's a possible glitch in the images. They appear to show up on a "seam" of two images. Follow the seam down, you'll find more.

reply to post by Julie Washington


Julie its possibly a glitch, if so why are there no other glitches like these two anywhere to be found. I'm sure I'm not the only person to look into these images. If its a glitch cause by location to adjacent texture, it would be picking up colour bleed. What I think you are taking for glitching is a trail, not texture joint. The winds on Mars will give you some of the effect where the ground acts as a wind break due to variations in local height.

I am no expert but I do believe my eyes.

Originally posted by marsorbust
Julie its possibly a glitch, if so why are there no other glitches like these two anywhere to be found.

But there are more, Julie said precisely that; follow the seem between the two images and you can see more of those.










I stopped looking when I reached that position, I think you can get the idea with four more of those.

I am no expert but I do believe my eyes.

Funny, so do I, and I also trust my experience.

Okay then, what are these?

45°42'37.22"N 23°33'33.74"E

45° 0'35.37"N 23°37'27.03"E

44°23'58.33"N 23°40'51.09"E

44°20'51.96"N 23°41'12.24"E

44°18'19.06"N 23°41'10.37"E

43°47'21.36"N 23°43'42.07"E

41°46'54.68"N 23°53'0.71"E

Originally posted by marsorbust
The grayscale is probably a red frame. Going by that method and the number of dust storms since the original was taken, it wouldn't rule out the earlier image.

What does the (possible) fact that the images I posted were taken through a red filter has to do with dust storms?

And why didn't those sand storms hid those "doors" before, only between the colour images (that I think were taken by Viking) and those taken by MRO's context camera?

Also I would like to see another image using the exact same method as the original.

I will look for the Viking images, if they are the correct ones (I think they are) then the original images will stop at that seem.

One mustn't forget the face of Mars is subject to change, and because of that, I wouldn't be too quick to rule out the op image.

Yes, according to the angle of the sun and the resolution of the photo, what we see changes, but it doesn't mean that things physically change.

Edit: It looks like the "background" image on Google Earth (for Mars) is not from Viking, at least the photo I found, this one doesn't look the same. Well, I have to keep on looking, but only tomorrow, it's getting too late here in Portugal.

[edit on 21/12/2009 by ArMaP]

reply to post by ArMaP


Thank-you ArMap, and Julie.

See, now I'm not so hard to deal with am I?

I see your point, both of you, I have been searching for the original also.

I want to know, for my own peace of mind, what the original shows.

Other than that, I will agree that it looks suspiciously like a texture joint.

Know this, I also seek truth, and also have lots of experience in imaging and detail. No, I am not an expert. I am a retired person, who has been doing this for many years. I'm always open to truth. Where I come from, ignorance carries another meaning, one which I dislike.

Take Care and thanks again to both of you. Appreciate your help very much.

Mob