It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
What give ME a "I can't believe he said that!" moment is when Dylan Avery had the gall to drop accusations of Popular Mechanics being guilty of yellow journalism, which is just plain idiotic.
Originally posted by mikelee
* LC crafted what many thought was a good point on 911 until some started verifying, corroborating, looking into and investigating the video's claims. In the end, its just a bunch of half truths, slick editing, shady videos that really don't "expose" anything of any substantial greatness.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Only after investigating what really happened on Sept. 11th did he decide to focus on the government conspiratorial aspects of the story.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
Originally posted by mikelee
* LC crafted what many thought was a good point on 911 until some started verifying, corroborating, looking into and investigating the video's claims. In the end, its just a bunch of half truths, slick editing, shady videos that really don't "expose" anything of any substantial greatness.
You're wrong. I've met and personally spoken with Dylan Avery. His initial goal was to produce a conventional documentary about 9/11. Only after investigating what really happened on Sept. 11th did he decide to focus on the government conspiratorial aspects of the story.
BTW, constantly straddling both sides of the fence doesn't lend you additional credibility. If you haven't made up your mind about 9/11 by now, then you probably never will.
Originally posted by mikelee
As I have stated in previous threads I believe the facts about 911 are a mix of OS truth as well as "conspiracy based" (for lack of a better description) truths/explanations.
Originally posted by Sean48
Originally posted by mikelee
Sean48: I honestly don't know how to respond to your post here. It just seems ignorant, unnecessary in general, arrogant in many ways, typical given the topic, immature at best and a failed attempt to make some sort of point that is pointless in many ways. Anyway, I wish you well with YOUR quest for whatever your seeking regarding 911.
[edit on 21-12-2009 by mikelee]
Originally posted by mikelee
* LC crafted what many thought was a good point on 911 until some started verifying, corroborating, looking into and investigating the video's claims. In the end, its just a bunch of half truths, slick editing, shady videos that really don't "expose" anything of any substantial greatness.
[edit on 21-12-2009 by mikelee]
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
I guess you don't know who was nicknamed the "Father of Yellow Journalism" and/or who owns Popular Mechanics.
Probably best to do a little research before you post your opinions.
Originally posted by GoldenFleece
You're wrong. I've met and personally spoken with Dylan Avery. His initial goal was to produce a conventional documentary about 9/11. Only after investigating what really happened on Sept. 11th did he decide to focus on the government conspiratorial aspects of the story.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
The moment the LC people have to employ censorship to protect their franchise, it's the moment they openly admit they're full of it.
Originally posted by Sean48
of the many OS people in these threads , your arguements are
more of the personal attack type, Killing the messager and ignoring
the message
I realize your passion for your cause , but a little more respect for
your opponents would probably stop you from being banned
FYI it's rather hard for Hearst to "own" Popular Mechanics since he's been dead since 1951 or so.