It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ugie1028
What do you think? am i wrong for seeing it this way, or is it because i don't believe in the official fairy tale?
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by GoodOlDave
this is a prime example of belittling comments, with no sources, just a vendetta against a group of people who don't see things as you see.
Dave, there are no words for your overzealous comparisons. so im guessing if there is one coo-coo in the room, all of them are?
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Dave, not once, ever in this forum, have you ever considered that you might be wrong?
Originally posted by ImAPepper
To tell you the truth Ugie... he is typically spot on. You make this thread crying about the media. Why should they take you seriously? You and your buddies hang out in Jersey spouting off ridiculous garbage on street corners. THEN your buddy accuses the Secret Service of calling his cell phone.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
And, it's no wonder when they seem shady to begin with.
Why, just the other day I thought of (gasp!) opening an account at "PilotsforTruth" because I'd lurked occasionally, and after seeing all the brouhaha here, what with certain ATS members who also post there dropping in occasionally, I was just finally so fed up I thought I had to say something over there...I have a LOT to say...
In addition ,the history of the U.S. media shows unsettling developments,not least of which is penetration by the intelligence community.
By the early 1950s,the CIA had cosy relationships with most major media executives in America.
The most significant of these were with the New York Times, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor, New York Herald Tribune, Saturday Evening Post, Miami Herald, Time-Life, CBS News, Scripps-Howard Newspapers, Hearst Newspapers, The Associated Press, United Press International, The Mutual Broadcasting System and Reuters.
In addition ,the CIA had major ownership over many proprietary publications throughtout Europe,Asia and the Americas.
By the early 1970s the agency admitted to having working relationships with over four hundred American journalists.
Consider the possiblities with four hundred strategically placed people throughout the mainstream media.
There is evidence that this relationship continues.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by hellfrozeover
When I see something that doesn't fit, I am inclined to hunt for an answer. And there are so many pieces to the OS puzzle that just plain don't fit. Why can't we all team up and really do some real science....both sides draw on eachother and see what can be accomplished.
It sure would make more sense and be more productive then the ranting and child-like name calling that I have witnessed to date.
Originally posted by hellfrozeover
reply to post by GoodOlDave
Excuse me, but I am new here and just can't for the life of me figure out why someone so angry and against all who thinks outside of the box as you, would even bother being associated with a forum like ATS?
Originally posted by ExPostFacto
If a person is "debunking" then they are not interested in the truth.
Originally posted by ugie1028
reply to post by hellfrozeover
Just place him on ignore. He wont listen to you anyway. he reacts emotionally, his arguments only support the OS, and anything against it, he will just ridicule you, Mame you, and outright insult you. he enjoys this, why? I do not know, and quite frankly, i dont care anymore. (just letting you know since your new.)
Originally posted by dereks
You are wrong there, debunk: To expose or ridicule the falseness, sham, or exaggerated claims of:
which is what debunkers are doing to the 911 truthers, exposing their bunk