It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
My suggestion to previous communities was to segregate the forum into a CONSPIRACY THEORY ADVOCATES section and an OPEN section. ...
The CONSPIRACY THEORY ADVOCATE section would only permit those who already believe in the subjective theory. There's a valid reasoning behind this:
Originally posted by antonia
(I mean really, it's so annoying when someone spouts "I can't wait till ______ gets here! he/she will be all over this"! Grow a spine and say something for yourself),
Originally posted by dereks
and that reason is the conspiracy theorists do not like the errors in their theories being pointed out, they also hate their little conspiracy theories being destroyed by facts
Originally posted by kyred
Thank you, my dear nephew, for introducing me to ATS. And I see why you left.
But, I am going to stick it out.
These clowns can't continue on in perpetuity. They get bored, eventually.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
The clowns might not be perpetual in themselves but their stock is. If you can understand this then you'll understand why it's a downhill battle lest my prior suggestion of segregation is considered.
Originally posted by rexusdiablos
You and I both, buddy. I've left three communites for the exact same reason only to arrive here and find that ATS is replete with the same issue.
My suggestion to previous communities was to segregate the forum into a CONSPIRACY THEORY ADVOCATES section and an OPEN section. The OPEN section would function very the same as ATS does now whereby rebuttal and ridicule are permitted. The CONSPIRACY THEORY ADVOCATE section would only permit those who already believe in the subjective theory. There's a valid reasoning behind this:
The validation of a conspiracy theory at times negates the very counteraction of the theory.
e.g. the lifetime you could potentially spend arguing with skeptics about the existence of globalist oligarchies is tantamount to the amount of time spent resisting and dismantling such organizations.
In layman's terms, true conspiracy theorists of a given theory should be allowed to work exclusively within the subset that is themselves.
It's just as DimensionalDetective said. I had to check the url as I began to wonder why I even have to justify all of this to what is supposed to be a conspiracy theory community.
Yes, yes, I'm all for freedom of speech but the freedom of speech that this community afford skeptics impedes on the freedom of action and progression of it's true conspiracy theorists. Segregation will solve this issue.
[edit on 12-12-2009 by rexusdiablos]
[edit on 12-12-2009 by rexusdiablos]
a very well thought out response indeed . I agree, and my hats off to that one.
Because this is only the beginning
Originally posted by davesidious
We have too many people like this on this board. We need clear, rational thought, or we might as well give up.