It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The only alternative explanation now is that the gas is produced by volcanic rock reacting with water on Mars. But the UK team says that previous studies have ruled out volcanism as a cause.
Professor Colin Pillinger, of the Open University, who was behind Britain's ill-fated Beagle 2 mission to Mars in 2003, says he does not accept a volcanic explanation.
He points out that the plumes of methane announced by NASA in January are not being produced in areas where there are volcanoes. He told Skymania News: "Methane is a product of biology. For methane to be in Mars' atmosphere, there has to be a replenishable source.
How can you be so sure?
Originally posted by Imagir
There are two possible sources:
You forgot to add... none of which have been found yet on Mars.
or............. MICROBES......
Originally posted by cowboys703
reply to post by Imagir
The volcanoes do not need to be active for serpentinization to occur
Originally posted by Imagir
Originally posted by cowboys703
reply to post by Imagir
The volcanoes do not need to be active for serpentinization to occur
Serpentinization on Mars: Fairy tales for children.
OK, if you are sorry I return to the discussion.
Originally posted by Imagir
Sorry for my irony, but what I would say is that:
Even if we accept that, I don't remember seeing any real proof of liquid water on Mars, so if that is the case then your "equation" is really lacking one of its elements.
In my opinion
Ice+water+methane=life.
What do you know about serpentinization to say that?
Serpentinization is unreal (or very low probabilities than the first) because the plumes of methane were detected very far volcanic areas.