It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WhiteDevil013
reply to post by LiveForever8
No, sorry for the confusion. I was agreeing with you and directing that remark toward the OP.
Im at work so I have to be quick with my posts, lest my boss comes in and catches me on ATS again and bans me from out server for the rest of the day.
Originally posted by Bluebelle
reply to post by LiveForever8
Oh dear! I'd love to see a thread with an 'in depth' analysis of those hidden messages.. if there's going to be crap (there's just too many puns that can be made here) posted on ATS, then this is the kind of stuff I want to see!
Originally posted by LiveForever8
Jeez...when will these types of threads stop?
Its actually really boring me now.
Originally posted by 6EQUJ5
Why ruin the mental sanctuary? We get enough reality from this messed up world.
I could answer you with three words POT KETTLE BLACK, but I like to be a little more gracious than that.
Nice use of the word ostentatious because it allows me to apply it to you and this OP.
EMPIRE: How about that for an Ostentatious username? What an enormous ego there must be squeezed inside your cranium.
THE OP: Wow such an ostentatious OP, just dying to get noticed so as to stroke your ego.
WORD COUNT Over 820 words! WOW! How's about that for getting your point across succinctly. That's pretty ostentatious of you OP, sorry I can't call you empire its just too funny, and i'd never be able to finish this post.
FROM YOUR PROFILE: Hows about this for ostenatiousness, ego and narcissitic personality disorder. ....More Stuff You Should Know- Long live the EMPIRE...
WOW (yes I can use capitals too) The size of the ego you reveal here is tremendous. How do you keep it all in your head?
and you ought to know, referring to yourself in the third person is never a good sign!
But don't worry. Precisely because we accept all comers here on ATS you're still welcome. Despite your personality disorder we accept you. Despite your accusations we accept you. You may not be an alien but it's people like you (and the aliens) that give us such wonderful light relief from the really serious stuff that goes on here on ATS.
I say long live the kooks (you included) because all work and no play leaves Jack so tired and downtrodden that he no longer has the energy to fight the NWO.
PS I'm really looking forward to your next ostentatious thread, do you think you could do one on Monday for me? I hate Mondays and a thread from you would really see me through the day with a smile on my face. Thanks in advance.
ooh oooh, it's time for me to sign off with capitals yey!
SPOOKFISH
Oh and by the way 250+ posts in 30 days is not being logged off for years. I wonder how many the count would be if the maximum wasn't the last 250.
Your stating that one should have proof for making such statements but what proof do you have that one should have proof.
Do you see the problem here?
It is similar to the problem that the logical positivism movement ran into as their primary thesis was something like 'all statements should be rooted or founded on empirical facts.'
Their achilles heel, of course, was that there was no empirical foundation to the imperative that their whole philosophy was founded on. Imperatives cannot be empirically verified because they are statements of ontological value such as goodness or badness and there is no element such as goodness that can be measured or weighed in the empirical manner that science requires.
In your post you stated something about thousands of children dying needlessly around the world. I, along with the vast majority of people, agree that needlessly dying children is a horrible thing and preventing such a thing from happening is a very noble cause, but you didn't provide any verifiable proof that needlessly dying children is a bad thing.
I don't think you need empirical proof to justify the belief that needlessly dying children is a bad thing nor do I think you'll ever find it as I explained in the above paragraph but I'm just trying further show you how if you use your own criterion of requiring proof for all statements then you wont be able to support some of your own positions.
Additionally, if as you seem to indicate, helping children is the highest pursuit, I think there are some other web sites that are devoted entirely to such causes and you may want to consider frequenting those sites rather than a site like ATS where the main stated directive is to discuss the sorts of topics you either don't seem to like or you require the sort of epistemological justification that rarely or ever will be presented or found.
Maltesers were created by Forrest Mars, Sr. in 1936, and originally known as "Energy Balls".
Originally posted by LiveForever8
Chocolate! Don't get me started on chocolate! Hollow Earth theory? Here's what happened......a deep space Malteser collided with Earth and, because of the momentum, just went straight though.
en.wikipedia.org...
Maltesers were created by Forrest Mars, Sr. in 1936, and originally known as "Energy Balls".
Energy Balls...see the connection there? And I'm sure I don't need to point out the name of Maltesers creator
Light beings, yer, not fans of chocolate. I knew some geezer who got caught with a couple of Crunchies during ascension and spent eternity scrubbing toilets in Shangri-La.