It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Hey Shrike,
I made a large cropping of your as15-m-2332 crater using a different source for the metrics.
Here ya go:
Originally posted by mcrom901
some interesting videos......
Karl Wolf - Disclosure Project
Donna Hare - Disclosure Project
LUNARCHITECTURE VOL 1
SHORT CLIP SHOWING RARELY SEEN IMAGE ALLEGEDLY TAKEN BY APOLLO 16 IN LUNAR ORBIT, SHOWING AN ANOMALY CLAIMED BY SOME TO BE A 'CLOUD' OF LIGHT TRAVELLING OVER THE LUNAR SURFACE TOWARDS LOBACHAVSKY CRATER, WHERE, AFTER REACHING THE CENTRE OF LOBACHAVSKY CRATER,THE PHENOMENON INEXPLICABLY DISAPPEARS OR DISSIPATES. ALSO SHOWS A COMPARISON BETWEEN THIS VERSION OF THE MORE FAMOUS ANOMALY CALLED 'TOWER' IN LOBACHAVSKY,AND A COUPLE OF THE MORE COMMON 'STANDARD' IMAGES SPAT OUT BY SEARCH ENGINES WHEN SEARCHING FOR 'ANOMALY IN LOBACHAVSKY' OR 'TOWER' IN LOBACHAVSKY. THIS IMAGE, AS16-73-H-1113,IS MORE COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS 'LIGHTS IN LOBACHAVSKY',WHEN YOU CAN LOCATE IT THAT IS! HAPPY HUNTING ANOMALY SEEKERS!!!, , , , , , , , , , , EMF29768
Google Video Link
LUNARCHITECTURE VOL 2 (EMF29768's CUT)
VIDEO COMPILATION OF IMAGES OF THE LUNAR SURFACE SHOWING UNUSUAL OR ANOMALOUS OBJECTS WHICH SUGGEST THAT INTELLIGENCE AND DESIGN MUST HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN THIER CREATION, AND RULING OUT COMPLETELY THE 'NATURAL ORIGIN' HYPOTHESES OF THESE 'CONSTRUCTS' AND LENDING CREDENCE TO THE 'ARTIFICIALITY HYPOTHESES' ,WHICH TENDS TO SUGGEST THAT THE 'MOON' AS WE CURRENTLY ARE LED TO BELIEVE BY THE POWERS THAT BE IS IN FACT 'DULL AND LIFELESS AND UNINHABITABLE' IS ACTUALLY THE TOTAL OPPOSITE, AND IS PRESENTLY OCCUPIED AND HAS BEEN FOR THE RELATIVELY RECENT HISTORY, BY THE BEINGS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SIGHTINGS OF UNIDENTIFIED FLYING OBJECTS THAT ARE REPORTED EVERY SINGLE DAY SOMEWHERE ON EARTH,IN EVERY COUNTRY BY EVERY RACE AND COLOUR AND CREED OF BEINGS THAT INHABIT THIS WORLD.ENJOY!ENJOY!ENJOY!
Google Video Link
edited to correct the 2nd disclosure link.... tnx eeasynow
[edit on 12-10-2009 by mcrom901]
Originally posted by mcrom901
Lunar Sightings - Volume 1 "Dreamland" Preview - Moon Structures
An example of my image analysis research of Apollo era photography showing what appears to be structures or bases on the moon. This is a controversial topic and I hereby make no claims of conspiracy, cover-ups, or the like by governments, organizations (i.e. NASA, JPL, etc.), or individuals. Instead of pointing fingers, let's instead offer amnesty to anyone that may be aware of this or other supporting evidence. No harm, no foul to those that come forward. I hereby claim that all images presented are faithfully reproduced and not altered in any way other than by cropping, adjusting contrast levels, de-saturation, or enlargement. No sharpening or coloring has been applied. It is up to you to research the images presented and arrive at your own conclusions. If you take the time to establish the contacts as I have done and dig up these same high-resolution archive images, I guarantee that you will see that the images presented here are not a hoax - at least on my part.
Google Video Link
Originally posted by The Shrike
Shorthand for where's the beef (i.e. evidence)?
Originally posted by mcrom901
in regards to the above video..... here are some more details.....
these quotes are from....
Apollo 11 Technical Air-to-Ground Voice Transcription, July 1969, 626 pages
furthermore....
and these are from....
Apollo 11 Onboard Voice Transcription-Command Module, August 1969, 248 pages
and finally.....
www.llnl.gov...
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
If you don't have any expectations, then why did you spend so much time looking at hundreds of moon pictures? Why do you spend any time on this thread? You must have some expectations. I sense you are disappointed by investing so much time and finding nothing. By being here, you are still looking for something... Hopefully something will turn up here that interests you
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
I have on many occasions posted something initially that I thought was strange, but then explained it as a natural occurence. That is also part of the fun for me.
Fortunately, I have not had to retract anything I posted and all I had to add was a clearer description if needed.
You just said the same thing I did... in slightly different terms. Do you consider further analysis a "retraction", or feel "fortunate" enough not to have ever changed your original point of view on a photo?
Yes, you mentioned previously that you were a lunar anomaly hunter since the 80's, which I have respect for However, it appears you are a just a bit bitter about finding nothing you consider worth while for your efforts. Kind of reminds me of the movie "National Treasure"... you are playing the part of John Voight, are you not? Come on... you saw the ending, right?... join the persuit. We could use your experience!!!
Originally posted by mcrom901
reply to post by The Shrike
oh really?
as you seem to be the lunar expert.... why dont you lend your expertise in sorting out some terrestrial anomalies......
hamptonroads.com...
Originally posted by The Shrike
It was frustrating, though, to be honest, seeing John Lear suckin' in his blind followers who kept begging him for more and he must have been laughing his butt off at the crazies. I wasn't one of them, of course.
Originally posted by Exuberant1
Look at this strange thing on the print... No it isn't Worm-Sign.
I wonder what it is made from? Any guesses?
Originally posted by mcrom901
reply to post by The Shrike
but your prosaic emulsion seems to be casting a shadow......
Originally posted by Zarniwoop
Originally posted by The Shrike
It was frustrating, though, to be honest, seeing John Lear suckin' in his blind followers who kept begging him for more and he must have been laughing his butt off at the crazies. I wasn't one of them, of course.
Therein lies the rub. You and other 'protecters of the innocent' feel that John Lear has sucked in poor, blind, feeble-minded followers. You really must think you are smarter than the rest of the herd to think that more than a few outliers believe everything John says. John stirs up the pot... He'll be the the first to admit that. If he's right on even less than 1% of what he says (yes, here we go with percentages again) then more power to him.
Originally posted by The Shrike
But my dear friend, you are assuming it is.
Originally posted by mcrom901
reply to post by The Shrike
here you go......