It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by minkey53
reply to post by Zeta Reticuli
Love the signature about being an Aliens Daddy lol.
When I was a teenager many moons ago, I was given a book that detailed alien 6 foot tall blond women abducting men and having sex for babies.
gave me wet dreams for months, wonder if any of it was true?
Originally posted by sphinx551
Originally posted by Pathos
reply to post by sphinx551
If you want us to believe in what you are saying, show us the evidence that clearly points to an alien presence.
Why should I? You skeptics will tear apart anything that falls in the category of "evidence" even if the evidence is real. I won't bother with you skeptics.
Originally posted by converge
Originally posted by Zeta Reticuli
and if ur "not interested" then you really have nothing to contribute on the existance of E.t.'s.
You are right- I'm not interested in contributing to the "existence of ETs". I'm interested in contributing to the search of the truth.
Starting off a search with a conclusion is not an investigation, merely an attempt to validate one's already held beliefs.
STILL a believer.
Take it easy, no one is trying to 'convert' you.
In fact, judging by your reaction to my attempt of injecting some common sense to the discussion of the reason why John Podesta visited the White House numerous times, I'd say there's no danger at all of you ever being convinced of anything else other than of what you already believe.
Originally posted by Zeta Reticuli
all im saying is once i hear a more possible explanation that sounds closer to the truth i would come out and say YES UR CORRECT. but nothing you have posted has made me feel that way.
STILL a believer.
Originally posted by Pathos
Originally posted by Zeta Reticuli
all im saying is once i hear a more possible explanation that sounds closer to the truth i would come out and say YES UR CORRECT. but nothing you have posted has made me feel that way.
STILL a believer.
What is your definition of truth in this circumstance?
What do you consider to be true? Personal belief or facts?
[edit on 17-11-2009 by Pathos]
Originally posted by Zeta Reticuli
but u can rely more on personal belief.
for instance, the earth USED TO BE the center of the universe, a so-called fact, now it is not.
well, after COUNTLESS of ppls sightings and recorded evidence i would have to say yes. until i hear a better explanation on what everyone refers to as "unknown", i will always believe that.
Originally posted by BO XIAN
reply to post by SirPatrickHenry
Perhaps some questions are possible . . .
What are their guesstimates about the following:
1. Timeline--soonest and latest most likely . . . disclosure window.
2. What are the 3-5 main goals from NASA's perspective, to be achieved, managed with disclosure?
3. What percentage of what NASA knows, would they guess will be disclosed?
4. How many key secrets might NOT be disclosed?
5. What quality and what type of visual media will be shared with the public?
THX IN ADVANCE. I'll try and check back but you are welcome to U2U me if I don't reply right away.
for instance, the earth USED TO BE the center of the universe, a so-called fact, now it is not.
well, after COUNTLESS of ppls sightings and recorded evidence i would have to say yes. until i hear a better explanation on what everyone refers to as "unknown", i will always believe that.
Originally posted by minkey53
Obama is supposed to be disclosing something the end of this month.