It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Amazon Review :
The Bush years have given rise to fears of a resurgent Imperial Presidency. Those fears are justified, but the problem cannot be solved simply by bringing a new administration to power.
In his provocative new book, The Cult of the Presidency, Gene Healy argues that the fault lies not in our leaders but in ourselves.
When our scholars lionize presidents who break free from constitutional restraints, when our columnists and talking heads repeatedly call upon the "commander in chief " to dream great dreams and seek the power to achieve them--when voters look to the president for salvation from all problems great and small--should we really be surprised that the presidency has burst its constitutional bonds and grown powerful enough to threaten American liberty?
The Cult of the Presidency takes a step back from the ongoing red team/blue team combat and shows that, at bottom, conservatives and liberals agree on the boundless nature of presidential responsibility.
For both camps, it is the president's job to grow the economy, teach our children well, provide seamless protection from terrorist threats, and rescue Americans from spiritual malaise.
Very few Americans seem to think it odd, says Healy, "when presidential candidates talk as if they're running for a job that's a combination of guardian angel, shaman, and supreme warlord of the earth."
Healy takes aim at that unconfined conception of presidential responsibility, identifying it as the source of much of our political woe and some of the gravest threats to our liberties.
If the public expects the president to heal everything that ails us, the president is going to demand--or seize--the power necessary to handle that responsibility.
Interweaving historical scholarship, legal analysis, and trenchant cultural commentary, The Cult of the Presidency traces America's decades-long drift from the Framers' vision for the presidency: a constitutionally constrained chief magistrate charged with faithful execution of the laws.
Restoring that vision will require a Congress and a Court willing to check executive power, but Healy emphasizes that there is no simple legislative or judicial "fix" to the problems of the presidency.
Unless Americans change what we ask of the office--no longer demanding what we should not want and cannot have--we'll get what, in a sense, we deserve.
What really is happening right now is massive exploitation of this crisis to create momentum and synergy and to harness it and channel it towards support of the next goals of the Internationalists and Elites to retake Iran and restore the Shah’s son to power on the Peacock Throne there and to create absolute U.S. Military hegemony in the strategic oil rich Persian Gulf.
Notice that Wikipedia already has a Nidal Malik Hasan page?
Suspect
Main article: Nidal Malik Hasan
Major Nidal Hasan
Major Nidal Malik Hasan, a 39-year-old American-born Muslim of Palestinian descent, who is a U.S. Army psychiatrist and MD, is the sole suspect in the shootings.
According to one of his cousins, Hasan is a practicing Muslim who became more devout after the deaths of his parents in 1998 and 2001.[41] His cousin did not recall him ever expressing any radical or anti-American views.[41] Hasan's cousin, Nader Hasan, a lawyer in Virginia, said that Nidal Hasan turned against the wars after hearing the stories of those who came back from Afghanistan and Iraq.[42]
Hasan attended the Dar al-Hijrah mosque in Falls Church, Virginia, in 2001, at the same time as two of the hijackers in the September 11 attacks, Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour,[43][44] but it is not known whether or not Hasan encountered them.[45] Hasan has expressed admiration for the teachings of Anwar al-Awlaki, who was the mosque's imam at the time.[46] Hasan had also given a classroom presentation that, according to Associated Press, "justified suicide bombings."[47]
Hasan was investigated by the FBI after intelligence agencies intercepted 10 to 20 emails over several months starting in December 2008 until early 2009 with Awlaki, who was under surveillance. Army employees were informed of the contacts, but there was no threat was perceived from the general questions about spiritual guidance regarding conflicts between Islam and military service, which were judged to be consistent with mental health research about Muslims in the armed services.[48] A DC-based joint terrorism task force that operates under the FBI was notified, and the information reviewed by one of its Defense Criminal Investigative Service employees. The assessment concluded there was not sufficient information for a larger investigation.[49] Despite two Defense Department investigators on two joint task forces having looked into Hasan's communications, higher-ups at the Department of Defense stated they were not notified before the incident of such investigations.[50] In July 2009 he had been transferred from Washington's Walter Reed Medical Center to Fort Hood.
Hasan gave away furniture from his home on the morning of the shooting, saying he was going to be deployed. He also handed out copies of the Qur'an, along with his business cards which listed a Maryland phone number and read "Behavioral Heatlh [sic] - Mental Health - Life Skills | Nidal Hasan, MD, MPH | SoA(SWT) | Psychiatrist".[51][52] According to Jeff Sadoski, spokesperson of U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Hasan was upset about his deployment[53] to Afghanistan[54] on November 28. Noel Hamad, Hasan's aunt,[55] said that the family was not aware he was being sent to Afghanistan.[56]
According to National Public Radio (NPR), officials at Walter Reed had repeatedly expressed concern about Hasan's behavior for the entire six years that he was there. During that time period, Hasan's supervisors had repeatedly given him poor evaluations and warned him that he was doing substandard work. During the spring of 2008, and some other times afterward, several key officials had meetings to discuss what to do about Hasan. According to NPR, attendees of these meetings reportedly included the chief of psychiatry at Walter Reed, the chairman of the Psychiatry Department at USUHS, the assistant chair of the Psychiatry Department and director of Hasan's psychiatry fellowship, another assistant chairman of psychiatry at USUHS, another psychiatrist, and the director of the psychiatric residency program at Walter Reed. According to NPR, both fellow students and faculty were strongly troubled by Hasan's behavior, which they described as being, "disconnected," "aloof," "paranoid," "belligerent," and "schizoid."[57]
[edit] Possible motivation
Immediately after the shooting, analysts and public officials openly debated Hasan's motive and preceding psychological state: A military activist, Selena Coppa, said: "This man was a psychiatrist and was working with other psychiatrists every day and they failed to notice how deeply disturbed someone right in their midst was."[21]
U.S. Senator Joseph Lieberman called for a probe by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, which he chairs. Lieberman said "it's premature to reach conclusions about what motivated Hasan ... I think it's very important to let the Army and the FBI go forward with this investigation before we reach any conclusions."[58][59]
Michael Welner M.D., a leading forensic psychiatrist with experience examining mass shooters, said that the shooting had elements common to both ideological and workplace mass shootings.[60] Dr. Welner, who believed the motivation was to create a "spectacle", said that a trauma care worker, even one afflicted with stress, would not be expected to be homicidal toward his patients unless his ideology trumped his Hippocratic oath–and this was borne out in his shouting "Allahu Akhbar" as he killed the unarmed.[60] An analyst of terror investigations, Carl Tobias, said that the attack did not fit the profile of terrorism, and was more reminiscent of the Virginia Tech shooting.[61]
However, Michael Scheuer, the retired former head of the Bin Laden Issue Station, and former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey[62] have called the event a terrorist attack,[61] as has Fox News contributor Walid Phares.[63] Retired General Barry McCaffrey said on Anderson Cooper 360° that "it's starting to appear as if this was a domestic terrorist attack on fellow soldiers by a major in the Army who we educated for six years while he was giving off these vibes of disloyalty to his own force."[64]
Brian Levin of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism wrote that the case sits at the crossroads of crime, terrorism, and mental distress.[65] He compared the possible role of religion to the beliefs of Scott Roeder, a devout Christian who murdered Dr. George Tiller, who practiced abortion. Such offenders "often self-radicalize from a volatile mix of personal distress, psychological issues, and an ideology that can be sculpted to justify and explain their anti-social leanings."[65]
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
What really is happening right now is massive exploitation of this crisis to create momentum and synergy and to harness it and channel it towards support of the next goals of the Internationalists and Elites to retake Iran and restore the Shah’s son to power on the Peacock Throne there and to create absolute U.S. Military hegemony in the strategic oil rich Persian Gulf.
I don't think Obama's mind is working in that direction,
Pay attention to Eric Holder’s law firm and Gitmo detainees
michellemalkin.com...
When I read this connection, whoa, my head is spinning.
[edit on 103030p://bSaturday2009 by Stormdancer777]
Originally posted by star in a jar
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
Notice that Wikipedia already has a Nidal Malik Hasan page?
Yes isn't that interesting? I wonder what date it first came up. Days after the shooting, or on the day of the shooting? That would be something.
Interesting again that the 'article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.'
Someone realizing that they went overboard or let too many things out of the bag?
As long as the people believe in these charades and illusions they will continue to be highly effective.
Unless Obama wants his people to hide evidence of something before congress finds it
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
This makes no since. Nothing wrong with 2 investigations going at once.. Unless Obama wants his people to hide evidence of something before congress finds it... only reason I can think of.
Quote from : Wikipedia : Nidal Malik Hasan : Higher Education, Military Service, and Medical Career
Higher education, military service, and medical career
Hasan joined the Army immediately after high school, and served eight years as an enlisted soldier while attending college.
He graduated from Virginia Tech in 1997 with a bachelor's degree in biochemistry, and went on to medical school at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences ("USUHS").
After earning his medical degree (M.D.) in 2001, Hasan completed his residency in psychiatry at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
While an intern at Walter Reed, he received counseling and extra supervision.
Slide 49/50 of The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military, a presentation made by Hasan during a symposium of U.S. Army physicians at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
While an intern at Walter Reed, he received counseling and extra supervision.
According to the Washington Post, Hasan made a presentation titled The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military during his senior year of residency at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
The presentation, which was not well received by some of the attendees, recommended that the Department of Defense "should allow Muslims [sic] Soldiers the option of being released as "Conscientious objectors" to increase troop morale and decrease adverse events."
That means back at Walter Reed, as an intern, they noticed he may have been problematic.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by SpartanKingLeonidas
That means back at Walter Reed, as an intern, they noticed he may have been problematic.
Incredibly, how can they possible defend all this?
Play close attention to the time line.
I noticed long ago you have a Fasces in your avatar, so I have to ask, are you in favor of the new Rome, or for the Fall of Rome?