It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by frankensence
Because some of us (like me) actually believe that GW Bush isn't the evil fascist that the left would have you believe. There are a lot of things he did that I didn't agree with, like trying to leave some our ports in the control of the United Arab Emmirates and not entering into environmental talks early on in his presidency.
And yet, GW Bush did FAR more damage to the constitution of the US than any other president. But you never saw Fox News cover any of that, it's always been about attacking the democrats. But why turn this into a debate about the merits of whatever president? Shouldn't this be about the INTEGRITY of a supposed "news" outlet? This is one more demonstration that Fox News has NONE.
So by what standard do you judge Fox News? By rest of the MSM out there?
If that's so, then what's the excuse for the other MSM outlets that aren't covering how Obama is trampling all over the Constitution right now? He's done more in his first year to trample Constitutional rights than Bush did in 8 years. But you won't see the other MSM outlets covering that. Where is their integrity?
Originally posted by shrike071
To my knowledge, this type of blatant fabrication has not been evident on other news channels and puts Fox in a league by itself.
It's sickening.
What has happened to journalistic ethics?! What has happened to integrity?
On to the clip:
news.videosift.com...
[edit on 11-11-2009 by shrike071]
This should be the nail-in-the-coffin for anyone that thinks that Fox is a 'credible' news source.
Originally posted by bsbray11
reply to post by shrike071
Not to mention you cannot find a bigger liar and downright ass-hat on television than Bill O'Reilly, right there in FOX's prime time. That has to count for something.
I swear this guy escaped from a circus one day and FOX thought he was serious.
Originally posted by Kerry_Knight
Do you know what CNN's answer to Bill Orielly is?
Keith Olberman
Originally posted by Kerry_Knight
Originally posted by bsbray11
reply to post by shrike071
Not to mention you cannot find a bigger liar and downright ass-hat on television than Bill O'Reilly, right there in FOX's prime time. That has to count for something.
I swear this guy escaped from a circus one day and FOX thought he was serious.
Do you know what CNN's answer to Bill Orielly is?
Keith Olberman
[edit on 12-11-2009 by Kerry_Knight]
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Kerry_Knight
Do you know what CNN's answer to Bill Orielly is?
Keith Olberman
Aw, come on. CNN has to do better than that. O'Reilly is trying to get into fist fights with Obama's security, throws an obscene fit when the teleprompter stops working, lies about what's in a book straight the face of the guy who wrote it. When he's caught in a lie he tries to weasel his way out by misconstruing things even more. And on top of all that, he's just loud, obnoxious, arrogant, the perfect thing for FOX to be feeding their target audience of stupid Americans on a nightly basis.
Olbermann is too much like a zombie to even compare to O'Reilly's stupid antics. They may both be equally brain-dead, but Olbermann's worst offenses are more along the lines of dropping big words like he had to pay for them. Not even in the same league as O'Reilly.
[edit on 12-11-2009 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by Angus123
Olberman isn't on CNN, lol.
Originally posted by Kerry_Knight
Originally posted by Angus123
Olberman isn't on CNN, lol.
Yeah I know, I am reffering to a story CNN did about the two of them showing olberman saying some of the things most of us take with a grain of salt but he makes a BIG deal about.
Originally posted by Angus123
Originally posted by sos37
Originally posted by frankensence
Because some of us (like me) actually believe that GW Bush isn't the evil fascist that the left would have you believe. There are a lot of things he did that I didn't agree with, like trying to leave some our ports in the control of the United Arab Emmirates and not entering into environmental talks early on in his presidency.
And yet, GW Bush did FAR more damage to the constitution of the US than any other president. But you never saw Fox News cover any of that, it's always been about attacking the democrats. But why turn this into a debate about the merits of whatever president? Shouldn't this be about the INTEGRITY of a supposed "news" outlet? This is one more demonstration that Fox News has NONE.
So by what standard do you judge Fox News? By rest of the MSM out there?
If that's so, then what's the excuse for the other MSM outlets that aren't covering how Obama is trampling all over the Constitution right now? He's done more in his first year to trample Constitutional rights than Bush did in 8 years. But you won't see the other MSM outlets covering that. Where is their integrity?
Name 3 things Obama has done to trample the Constitution. Verifiable, actual, provable things.... that he has DONE. Not things you can assert he WANTS to do. Not things you HEARD he did. Sourced, provable things HE HAS DONE.
Good luck, lol.
Originally posted by Kerry_Knight
Ya know what is the most ironic part of your post?
All that stuff you say about FOX. Well,, OBVIOUSLY, it hasn't stopped YOU from watching it either
Originally posted by shrike071
This should be the nail-in-the-coffin for anyone that thinks that Fox is a 'credible' news source. To my knowledge, this type of blatant fabrication has not been evident on other news channels and puts Fox in a league by itself.
It's sickening.
What has happened to journalistic ethics?! What has happened to integrity?
On to the clip:
news.videosift.com...
[edit on 11-11-2009 by shrike071]