It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Iran rejected the UN-drafted nuclear deal, the New York Times reported on Friday, citing American and European diplomatic sources.
A European diplomat told the paper that the Iranian response was basically a refusal. He said the Iranians wish to keep all their uranium, until they purchase nuclear fuel from the West for their research facility in Tehran. The diplomat said Iran's refusal to send out its uranium for further enrichment was no minor detail, as this is the essence of the deal.
Israel's prime minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, has handed the Kremlin a list of Russian scientists believed by the Israelis to be helping Iran to develop a nuclear warhead. He is said to have delivered the list during a mysterious visit to Moscow.
“There has been Russian help. It is not the government, it is individuals, at least one helping Iran on weaponisation activities and it is worrisome,” said David Albright, a former weapons inspector who is president of the Institute for Science and International Security.
Originally posted by lpowell0627
reply to post by Bcs8484
They offered Iran assistance in building a nuclear power plant -- the same plant that Iran claims it is trying to build and why it needs uranium in the first place
Keep in mind, Iran can't use the uranium they have now for power.
Here's the question: If Iran were only planning on using uranium for peaceful purposes -- to provide power to their citizens -- why do they need the other 70%?
This is not a case of the US/Israel wanting war.
This is a case where Iran thinks they can do whatever the hell they want, all while complaining that they are not accepted as legit by the "west".
Originally posted by Ignorance Denied
reply to post by Bcs8484
This deal was doomed to fail before it even started, next are sanctions, and iran have already said that if the US and isreal impose sanctions on iran, they will take it as an act of war..
Originally posted by lpowell0627
reply to post by Bcs8484
How does this equate with the US and Israel pushing for war? Have you not paid any attention to what actually happened?
They offered Iran assistance in building a nuclear power plant -- the same plant that Iran claims it is trying to build and why it needs uranium in the first place -- in exchange for said help, Iran was to ship about 70% of their uranium out of the country. This would leave them with not enough to build nuclear weapon. Keep in mind, Iran can't use the uranium they have now for power. When the plant was buit and operational, Iran would be able to purchase the uranium back.
Iran, in turn, said 'no, screw you'.
Here's the question: If Iran were only planning on using uranium for peaceful purposes -- to provide power to their citizens -- why do they need the other 70%?
They have no power plants now.
This is not a case of the US/Israel wanting war.
This is a case where Iran thinks they can do whatever the hell they want, all while complaining that they are not accepted as legit by the "west".
Give me a break.
I must have missed the "Iran is a saint" memo. Perhaps it was mailed right after they started murdering protestors.
Iran must figure that Russia can't let them fall or it would lose control of the Caspian Sea area.
According to the diplomatic sources, the Iranians refused to go along with the main clause of the draft agreement: A provision that would have required the country to send about 75% of its stockpile of low-enriched uranium to Russia to be processed and returned to Tehran.
“The key issue is that Iran does not agree to export its lightly enriched uranium,” the official said. “That’s not a minor detail. That’s the whole point of the deal.”
American officials said they believed the deal would buy them a year or so to reach a broader nuclear agreement, which they hoped would also defuse chances that Israel may try to strike the Islamic Republic's nuclear facilities.
The Obama administration expected Iran to reject the deal, and in recent days International Atomic Energy Agency chief Mohamed ElBaradei made secret trips to Washington to discuss how to move forward if this does happen.