It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
I would imagine natural selection endowed modern humans with a genetic imperative that ensured they steered clear of any such liaisons. I doubt the Neanderthals personalities were so infectious that modern humans were able to look beyond the aesthetics and transcend those boundaries.
IRM
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
I probably shouldn't say this(I don't want him as an enemy) but I always thought that Nikolai Valuev(the beast from the east) looks like a neaderthal
I can't tell you how many times I've looked at some people and thought "there's living proof Neanderthals never went extinct..."
Originally posted by DaMod
Originally posted by Alxandro
How kinky, though not suprising.
Wouldn't that be considered a form of beastiality, in reverse?
edit: ... for the record, I was responding to the original question by the OP, not to the post above mine.
[edit on 28-10-2009 by Alxandro]
Considering when you apply flesh to the skull of a Neanderthal you get this....
Look like anyone you know? Looks pretty Sapien to me....
The general framework and the factors behind the demise of the Neanderthals are still fiercely debated, and there remain many uncertainties in the data. While accelerator dating has purged the record of spurious fossils and confirmed the ages of others, it is likely that many of our current “dates” for the last Neanderthals and the earliest moderns in Europe are minimum ages, from the perspectives of both calibration and contamination by more recent radiocarbon. While the Aurignacian probably does reflect a dispersal of modern humans, it may not represent the oldest such dispersal into Europe. And while much new morphological data support a specific distinction for H. neanderthalensis, nevertheless the modern and Neanderthal lineages may be better characterized as allotaxa. Regarding the factors behind Neanderthal extinction, these are likely to have been many and varied, but almost certainly included the unstable climatic context of the period between 25–40,000 years ago. Finally, taking a wider context on the Neanderthal — sapiens relationship, we should remember that these events in western Europe were only the endpoints of hundreds of thousands of years of possible competition and interaction between these evolving lineages.
Originally posted by ldyserenity
I must say to that WTF happened to him??? WOW!!!
On this whole interbreeding thing, I don't know, I still contemplate how Darwin is possibly correct even the slightest bit as these seemingly seperate species of homo actually existed at the very same time in the history of man????
Just makes no sense to me...Maybe I am missing something?
Originally posted by DaMod
Considering when you apply flesh to the skull of a Neanderthal you get this....
Look like anyone you know? Looks pretty Sapien to me....
Originally posted by rnaa
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Highly doubtful. Two different species.
There would be no offspring from such a union.
Some modern humans have sex with sheep, but that is not the source of the modern phenomena of "sheeple".
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Knowing "modern man" i would say that this has to be the other way around...
Modern man 'had sex' with Neanderthals...
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
Knowing "modern man" i would say that this has to be the other way around...
Modern man 'had sex' with Neanderthals...
So I suppose you know Neanderthals well enough to believe they did NOT also want to have sex with Modern Humans?
Originally posted by Aeons
it is a distinction without difference.
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
Originally posted by Aeons
it is a distinction without difference.
I think there is a difference. In the animal world, there is usually an "initiator" of a sexual act. In the human animal (like many other animals), that initiator is usually the male.
[edit on 11/3/2009 by Soylent Green Is People]