It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Koka
Originally posted by Alfie1
Anyone who goes for the second alternative presumably also believes the BBC is " in on it "
Agreed, it's obvious the BBC realised the error of their ways when they cut the feed from Jane Standley at around 6 mins 45 seconds.
The BBC's problem was that they didn't know which building they were talking about, the BBC were reliant on the information they were being fed.
[edit on 23-11-2009 by Koka]
Originally posted by Alfie1
I won't ask you what proof you have; that would be ridiculous. But can you suggest any half-way plausible reason why the BBC should be complicit in the mass murder of US citizens and maintain their silence to this day.
Btw, the reporter being cut off was because the satellite feed, she was broadcasting to the UK, was on an electronic timer which cut out at 1715.
Originally posted by Koka
Originally posted by Alfie1
I won't ask you what proof you have; that would be ridiculous. But can you suggest any half-way plausible reason why the BBC should be complicit in the mass murder of US citizens and maintain their silence to this day.
Btw, the reporter being cut off was because the satellite feed, she was broadcasting to the UK, was on an electronic timer which cut out at 1715.
I don't have any proof, as I agreed with you.....
Where did you get the info regarding the cut off?
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Koka
Where did you get the info regarding the cut off?
From the BBC.