It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by The_Truth818
What I'm inferring is that without contact it's possible that our perception of the owl might be different.
Originally posted by SmokeJaguar67
reply to post by The_Truth818
This is very interesting. I have the book “Abduction” by John E Mack and if I recall correctly he did mention dear and owls in the context of the abduction experience.
I have read other accounts over the years where animals (owls predominantly) have been a part of the abduction experience, and this new film coming out shortly has obviously incorporated them into the story. Animals seem to be somehow linked to the phenomenon. Is this a cloaking mechanism or a mental projection as part of the controlling mechanism?
Starred and flagged for the lateral thinking
Originally posted by The_Truth818
reply to post by Skeptical Ed
What picture?
And to GOM, I'm not saying there is a biological connection between the two, just a symbolic one. It's significant because we have unknowingly made "them" a part of our culture while at the same time denying their existence. You have to remember, not everyone believes in extraterrestrials.
An explanation for the case has been proposed recently by Renaud Leclet, a French Ufologist. It could be a misidentification of a pair of Great horned owls, which are nocturnal, fly silently, have yellow eyes, and aggressively defend their nests. Leclet argues that this explanation fits well with the details of the case, including the appearance and behaviour of the "humanoids". The metallic sound of the striking bullets can be explained by the fact that some bullets hit some metallic objects of the farm, such as the fence. This misidentified bird hypothesis was echoed by Joe Nickell in a Skeptical Inquirer article.