It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by amari
reply to post by EyesII
I do not want to side track this thread for MOB but I will answer one question I
believe the ancient Egyptian Pyramids were built from disendance from Lumeria
and not what is known as Lemuria. Lumeria is where the Great Ones or Ancient
Ones came from and were known as Gods. You say but I do not read
anything about this in history books and you would be right. ^Y^
Originally posted by nightmarehalo
EDIT: The branches in the lower right-hand corner caused the motion blur throughout the whole picture. They were probably waved in front of the camera or something by the OP.
[edit on 27-10-2009 by nightmarehalo]
Originally posted by marsorbust
Here is a link to the full image of another view.
www....(nolink)/?jldneyydobw
Originally posted by EyesII
-If they were being waved, the OP must have really long arms to do that and still take the picture. (Please look at the 4th picture)
-EyesII
Originally posted by EyesII
Originally posted by nightmarehalo
EDIT: The branches in the lower right-hand corner caused the motion blur throughout the whole picture. They were probably waved in front of the camera or something by the OP.
[edit on 27-10-2009 by nightmarehalo]
Nightmarehalo:
Please look at page ten, 1st post on top, 2nd picture down.
Do you know of any natural branches that look like steps, or appear to be comprised of squares in sequence?
Also, you say that the OP is waving the branches.
-If they were being waved, the OP must have really long arms to do that and still take the picture. (Please look at the 4th picture)
-If there is camera motion blur, then the whole picture would show motion blur, in the same direction for the same length. That is not the case.
-If there were tree motion blur, then you would see the trees having some blurs, not only the "leaves". The trees are in focus - no motion blur there.
MOB - We eagerly await your next photo posting.
Originally posted by uninspired
Originally posted by EyesII
-If they were being waved, the OP must have really long arms to do that and still take the picture. (Please look at the 4th picture)
-EyesII
Except the OP said the camera was on a tripod, and I believe he said it has a remote shutter button...my friends camera has the same thing. You can be quite a distance from the camera and still take a picture while waving or even dancing or whatever you may be doing while taking pictures.
I'm not saying he was waving anything just saying its possible.
-Uninspired