It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Alchemst7
reply to post by alienesque
here is a draft from the .gov webbsite which makes reference to this. If this draft was passed or not I have to search...getting ready for work right now. I will definatly take your challenge and answer it!!
Draft
Originally posted by Raist
reply to post by RestingInPieces
Remember Mr. Burns did that on the Simpsons many years ago.
I am sure if they could find a way to do something like that and tax us for it they would.
Raist
Originally posted by Alchemst7
reply to post by alienesque
Alienesque..I went to the FDA website FDA.gov and typed Codex in there search box. There are page after page about the FDA conforming to Codex and there is more than enough evidence of these codes taking effect and the many letters of concerns which people have sent and petitioned that the FDA have copied and posted on there website. Here is also a link to Codex Alimentarius standards list.
FDA search Codex
Codex standards
There is definately no internet Myth here!
Peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field. Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish; and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Although generally considered essential to academic quality, peer review has been criticized as ineffective, slow, and misunderstood (see anonymous peer review and open peer review). Pragmatically, peer review refers to the work done during the screening of submitted manuscripts and funding applications. This process encourages authors to meet the accepted standards of their discipline and prevents the dissemination of irrelevant findings, unwarranted claims, unacceptable interpretations, and personal views. Publications that have not undergone peer review are likely to be regarded with suspicion by scholars and professionals.
----------------------------INDICATIONS AND USAGE-----------------------------
• Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine is an inactivated influenza virus vaccine indicated for active immunization of persons ages 18 years of age and older against influenza disease caused by pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. (1)
• This indication is based on the immune response elicited by the seasonal trivalent Influenza Virus Vaccine manufactured by CSL (AFLURIA). CSL’s Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine and AFLURIA are manufactured by the same process. There have been no controlled clinical studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with AFLURIA.
There have been no controlled clinical studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with AFLURIA.