It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by hangedman13
Or Iran could overstep itself and get nuked by Pakistan. Not everything on this earth is controlled by tptb. Sometimes a idiot has to learn the hard way....
Originally posted by john124
Hmm I'm sceptical of this source. And I doubt Iran would invade Pakistan anyway.
Originally posted by 2kni3
Iran is controlled by england ..
England installed that regime .
Iranian sources report that Tehran will have to make good on its threats without too much delay or lose face among the political and ethnic minority dissidents plaguing on the regime, especially those who rose up in protest against the tainted June 20 presidential election. Hesitation will be seen as weakness.
Originally posted by KissMyBass
reply to post by Eye On War
I must be confused. So you think England could control Iran and so they tell them to make threats against the US, Pakistan, and the UK so that if Israel attacks Iran's nuclear facilities it will be better supported.
So why wouldn't the UK cut to the chase and tell Iran to shut down its nuclear facilities if they actually controlled them?
This is nuts!
Debkafile is run by the Mossad so their is the possibility this is just propaganda for Israel,
Originally posted by 2kni3
Iran is controlled by england ..
England installed that regime .
Originally posted by really
Actually, militarily, Dooper has a real point. Pakistan has some crack troops. They've been used by the UN many, many times. They are well prepared. Iran did have more than a lot of trouble with the Iraqis and if Saddam was a better military strategist the Iranians may very well have lost.
Originally posted by mr-lizard
Iraq didn't really engage in a war with Iran, instead they used chemical weapons on the fringe or Iran. BIG DIFFERENCE.
[edit on 19-10-2009 by mr-lizard]