It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Orion7911
funny how I've never seen anyone anywhere offer any logical counter-argument to the points and context of what that article discusses.
How about THIS for a counter argument? The guy who started this thread was physically there on 9/11, saw the plane with his own eyes, and even posted the location where he saw it. The guy who wrote that blurb wasn't.
Originally posted by jprophet420
I really like that logic, and I would follow it if it weren't for the fact that one of out own members right here claims to have seen flight 77's right wing fall off when it struck a light pole, and then proceed to hit the pentagon. If its wing was clipped it would not have been able to hit the pentagon while remaining nearly parallel to the ground.
Originally posted by nwodeath
It's only a matter of time before the world knows about the TV fakery. If they could put it on the news the morning of 9-11, the media is definitely in on it and that means the pentagon as well.
Originally posted by ascisco
Cause by not tracking the shot correctly. There was surely some composite shop or TV fakery going on that morning. It obvious to anyone with basic knowledge of video composting
[edit on 2-11-2009 by ascisco]
Originally posted by ugie1028
i said my peice. ill let this thread die now. i regret sharing my story with immature brats.
Originally posted by ugie1028
As a member here for a very long time, i like the people here, ive seen a lot of crazy things but...
The NPT (no plane theory) in the 9/11 forum has gone a bit too far!
why?
Because i was in jersey city, NJ across the Hudson, I saw everything from when the first plane hit to the second plane hitting.
How can they say there were no planes when i saw WITH MY OWN DAMN EYES that PLANES hit the towers?
May i also add description of the planes... since im here...
the planes were all silver, solid silver. if anything, the planes were no American airliners, but planes DID IN FACT hit the towers!
[edit on 10/19/2009 by ugie1028]
Mod Edit: All Caps – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 19 Oct 09 by Gools]
Originally posted by RipCurl
Originally posted by ascisco
Cause by not tracking the shot correctly. There was surely some composite shop or TV fakery going on that morning. It obvious to anyone with basic knowledge of video composting
[edit on 2-11-2009 by ascisco]
Well seeing that I worked for a major studio and did film editing and compositing (and have been doing computer animation for almost 20 years), what you are claiming is absolutely wrong.
also, you are using highly compressed video to do your analysis (flaw number 1) and there was no technology that existed in 2001 that did what you are claiming its doing (flaw 2). And if you had ANY idea of how this type of shot can be done, you would know why you are wrong.
Nice that you throw out your "expertise" but, in this instance, it doesn't provide any help to you at all.
Originally posted by ugie1028
As a member here for a very long time, i like the people here, ive seen a lot of crazy things but...
The NPT (no plane theory) in the 9/11 forum has gone a bit too far!
why?
Because i was in jersey city, NJ across the Hudson, I saw everything from when the first plane hit to the second plane hitting.
How can they say there were no planes when i saw WITH MY OWN DAMN EYES that PLANES hit the towers?
May i also add description of the planes... since im here...
the planes were all silver, solid silver. if anything, the planes were no American airliners, but planes DID IN FACT hit the towers!
[edit on 10/19/2009 by ugie1028]
Mod Edit: All Caps – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 19 Oct 09 by Gools]
Originally posted by nwodeath
My little sister saw the twin towers on 9-11. She was standing right there before the first plane strike. She claims no planes hit the towers, and she claims she never saw anything but explosions.
Now how do you explain that?
Her friend works around the corner from the twin towers and was having coffee that morning across the street but she was on the opposite side. She claims she saw nothing either, but heard explosions. So there! What do you have to say to that?
[edit on 19-10-2009 by nwodeath]
Originally posted by ugie1028
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/c901f8929d46.jpg[/atsimg]
files.abovetopsecret.com...
the view i had of the first plane hitting.
one image is from the street view, and the other is the main google earth view.
Originally posted by tomfrusso
Actually, I have found the No Plane Theory to be one of the most Laughable of the 911 trueth movement - right next to super thermite, holographic planes, alien involvement......