It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One of these strategies involves a "wait-and-see" approach in the event that the timeframe of 2012-2017 features some sort of major cataclysmic Earth Changes that dramatically affects all human life on Earth.
Originally posted by wylekat
I can tell you exactly when the world ends. Immediately after I get married.
Unfortunately, I have no time frame for that.
Originally posted by xEphon
This doesn't make any sense to me. Now David is saying 2012 is really 2012-2017? I thought the timeframe was more like 2011-2012...
Does he not believe his own predictions that things will change in 2012!?
[edit on 13-10-2009 by xEphon]
Things like levitation, telekinesis and time travel become something everybody can do without even having to exert themselves.
THE BIG HORSE RACE
I also have come to see this as a horse race. There are two completely different ways disclosure could happen that I have heard from firsthand insider testimony, from totally unrelated but highly credible sources, and Kerry Cassidy has heard of another completely different plan for disclosure from yet another unrelated but credible source.
The Illuminati factions, I am told, have always planned to have all this information come out, but felt the concomitant new technologies associated with disclosure would create a population boom that would destroy the Earth if it were released before a major reduction in world population size took place.
If it were up to them, they would not allow any of this to come forward until one of a variety of population-reduction strategies were implemented. One of these strategies involves a "wait-and-see" approach in the event that the timeframe of 2012-2017 features some sort of major cataclysmic Earth Changes that dramatically affects all human life on Earth.
Many insiders sincerely believe this must be done in order to "save the world", yet the data consistently shows that as societies are allowed to develop, the birth rate decreases rather than increases. Grinding poverty leads to people having children in order to ensure their survival. As they develop, they have far fewer children and put more time and attention into the ones they have.
On a fundamental level, many insiders have a sarcastic, cynical and highly racist view of humanity, and I do not support it. Nor do many within their own ranks. In fact, I am seeing more and more evidence of widespread dissent within these groups, with the genocidal aspirations no longer being embraced.
Originally posted by randomiser
reply to post by xEphon
I believe that misunderstood what he was initially stating. If you re-read the entire passage, you'll see it says:
THE BIG HORSE RACE
I also have come to see this as a horse race. There are two completely different ways disclosure could happen that I have heard from firsthand insider testimony, from totally unrelated but highly credible sources, and Kerry Cassidy has heard of another completely different plan for disclosure from yet another unrelated but credible source.
The Illuminati factions, I am told, have always planned to have all this information come out, but felt the concomitant new technologies associated with disclosure would create a population boom that would destroy the Earth if it were released before a major reduction in world population size took place.
If it were up to them, they would not allow any of this to come forward until one of a variety of population-reduction strategies were implemented. One of these strategies involves a "wait-and-see" approach in the event that the timeframe of 2012-2017 features some sort of major cataclysmic Earth Changes that dramatically affects all human life on Earth.
Imminent Future Changes
He even states that it is his belief, which corroborates with outside tesitmony that the "negative elite" has plans to unleash this tech when they see fit, that's the 2012-2017 to which he was refferring.
Originally posted by Sparkly_Eyed777
reply to post by xEphon
Originally posted by xEphon
This doesn't make any sense to me. Now David is saying 2012 is really 2012-2017? I thought the timeframe was more like 2011-2012...
Does he not believe his own predictions that things will change in 2012!?
[edit on 13-10-2009 by xEphon]
Thing is, if you predict something, it doesn't always mean it'll happen at the time it's been predicted. It can always change because the future isn't predetermined. It isn't set in stone. It's malleable like clay. You can change it to be the way you want it to be by the actions in the present.
Hope this helps?