UFO's? [HOAX]

The pictures in this thread have been determined to be a hoax.
damning evidence:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Sent to me via E-Mail

A friend of mine sent me these images via E-Mail, I have been looking at them and something doesn't quite seem right with them...

I havn't seen them anywhere around the internet before, so they look to be original and need some insight realy as to what they could be!

My friend said that he took the photographs, but he lies quite a bit!

Anyway Enjoy and tell me what you think of em!

The Images

UFO 1
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a84555a0f100.jpg[/atsimg]
UFO 2
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a8f84aa34528.jpg[/atsimg]



[edit on 29-9-2009 by Crakeur]

Looks Shopped, but I'm not an expert. Just my perception. :/

reply to post by impaired


Thats what I was thinking, however I have never seen my mate use photoshop before and I doubt he is cabable of such artistic flair...

The first image clearly shows three 'exposures' as if stacked from consecutive frames of a movie. This doesn't ring true at all frankly. I guess this 'blur' is supposed to convey the impression of movement, but doesn't work. Assuming the image was taken by a conventional camera or phone, then the blur would be smooth and continuous, not stepped. It's fake IMO.

WG3

reply to post by waveguide3


And it looks like the same "ship" in both pictures, which were obviously taken at two different times... The chances of that are slim. I mean, to see a UFO is a rare chance, let alone two or 3. But the same ship? And to have a camera out at that time?

I'm just going by logic over here. I mean that would be cool as hell if it was real, but I'm sorry. It just doesn't look right. Looks like an artificial blur.

Like I said, I'm not an expert and I could totally be wrong. We need Phage up in here!

Edit to add: Actually, it could very well be the same (superimposed picture of the) ship. It has the same glare in both pics.

Nice try on his part.



[edit on 9/28/2009 by impaired]

reply to post by impaired


I totally agree! Ive been trying to get into contact with my mate and he isn't answering his phone or texting back, so I will just have to wait! He doesn't know I go on this site so...

Maybe someone can stop his BS

reply to post by The Songwriter


Hey, it's all good. Not to speak for everyone here at ATS, but I'm sure they all appreciate you trying bring this to light. That's what this site is here for!

You need to play a hella prank on him for this one, hehe.

Originally posted by The Songwriter
Thats what I was thinking, however I have never seen my mate use photoshop before and I doubt he is cabable of such artistic flair...

Yeah but that's an easy one to do.
I could crank that out in a matter of minutes.

My wife even faster.

Those pics even kind of look like stock photographs.

Offhand I'd say they appear to be photoshopped.
I personally think someone is having a laugh.

If not your mate, then the person that gave him those.

- Lee

reply to post by impaired


Haha! I was thinking of sneaking into his house on halloween, when he is asleep and me and my friends dressing up as aliens or something, and looking down on him with a massive torch or something lol!

Thanks for your interest in the thread

reply to post by The Songwriter


Dude, don't do it on halloween! Do it on a regular day! There are gonna be alot of aliens walking around on halloween, haha.

reply to post by impaired


Haha do it everynight That would just mess him up! I will do it the third of every month at witching hour 3:33

That would just mess him up even more

just my opinion - but these objects do look a bit suspect to me... there is just something about them... as an earlier poster stated it is probably that the blur does not look too real.....

If they are real, they are pretty impressive.

However, I am skeptical. On the first picture, that is a very weird angle to take the photo. Why would one bend down like that to get the photo when you could easily just be standing up? If I saw a UFO I would just take the picture. I wouldn't be trying to get in a weird position to get a cool angle or something.

But anyway, could be real, might not be. Dunno.

Friend text me back saying that they are genuine and he took them, so...
I don't know what to believe haha!

I want to believe

[Paint.NET ] [080
ASSESSMENT: Class 1 - Image is processed/edited

This was on both photos, hoax.

Can't understand what he would be taking a picture of.
Most UFOs don't come close to even looking as good.
Well we got the cow in the photo.
Yeah you put the photos up sounds like a good idea for him.
Then he doesn't have to explain them.
But what if there is no explanation.
And he doesn't have Photoshop.
Well he got them from someone else.
Photo analysis needs the original digital file in some cases.

I used photoshop quite a bit in my time as you can tell by my avatar and, well, hate to say it but, those do look a bit photoshopped to me. Who's to say though, we weren't there so its anybodies guess at this point...


PEACE!!!

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/5a69301b5c2a.jpg[/atsimg]

Clearly shoped, picture and colors have been manipulated.
Can we get a hoax tag?

[edit on 28-9-2009 by zaiger]

clearly photoshoped to the naked eye yet when you open the jpg in wordpad you get this stray code:

CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 80

Meaning yes it is somewhat photoshoped using another program

The 2nd image is a cleaned up version of this
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/531937b88a1b.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/237d6434b829.jpg[/atsimg]
Oh yeah and i forgot to point out the obvious. In the 2nd photo there appears to be a tree growing out of the sky, as if the UFO was suposed to be the unbelievable part I guess that is Niburu getting VERY close. Everyone should really look at these pictures, i think they might be some kind of test where you have to find the things wrong with the picture.

[edit on 28-9-2009 by zaiger]

[edit on 28-9-2009 by zaiger]

[edit on 28-9-2009 by zaiger]