It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fleabit
That's a load of bull. They haven't proved this. They have "proved" that this contains what flu vaccinations have contained for decades now. That's it. ATS just has the knack of taking a normal, well-known fact, and blowing it 10,000 times out of proportion, and making it seem like this was a super-secret evil agenda.
There is no proof that this will not help contain the # of cases. Just guesses and wild theories.
(snip)
Holy crap this board manges to blow stuff vastly out of proportion.
Why do you suppose the creators of the experimental H1N1 Vaccine have it mandated legally that they can not be held responsible for any adverse reactions to this vaccine and that no one can sue them? How much faith does that show from the vaccines very creators?
Blowing stuff vastly out of proportion? According to them the H1N1 flu strain is not responsible for killing hardly anyone....... remember..... it was always the "other underlying health conditions" that is killing the H1N1 victims. Let us also not forget that the common flu is more deadly according to the MSM. Flu vaccinations have never been made mandatory as this one is now.
Who's blowing what out of proportion here? In this particular thread it would appear the the hospitals in New York are. This is based on factual evidence supplied in the OP.
[edit on 9/23/2009 by dreams n chains]
Originally posted by fleabit
But why tkae a vaccine for such a weak virus in the first place. I have had this swine flu as have several of my friends and it was no worse than normal flu. Felt really ill for one day, not so good on second day and then by third day starting to get back to normal.
I don't know what you mean by "mild." If by mild, you mean people are not dropping over dead, then who knows. But of course, many are reacting badly, even if they don't get the further issues with breathing, which is where things go south. Very high temps, completely out of it for a week or so, it's hardly "mild" in that sense. If half of the nations population were gone for a week due to this flu alone, the consequences economically would be severe.
You know, I don't doubt some countries may try to further their agendas using this flu as an excuse. But that's no reason to not take it seriously.
With Katrina, people got on our government in the worst way for not being prepared. Now, they are getting all over our government in the worst way for TRYING to be prepared. You do realize they can't win, no matter what they do. I think many would only be happy if the government turned over all power to the "people." Of course, watching people drive, and trying to deal with each other in lines at supermarkets, I laugh thinking that "people" think they are any more fit to run a country, when they can't manage the simpliest of social transactions. It would be utter chaos and ruin.
Do big pharms have a stake in this? Probably. That doesn't make the flu not real, or the threat non-existent. It still needs to be addressed.
I look at people on this board saying "omg don't get this.. if you get this you are stupid and you will DIE!"
I hope people really research this further than this board, and not take such "sage" advice. My wife has diabetes. She wants the shot. I won't dissuade her. I wonder if people here even think about those with existing conditions. If the shot could have saved them, and they listen to all this fear-mongering, sensationlist bullcrap instead, and die due to complications from the swine flu.. would these folks even feel remorse?
ccording to them the H1N1 flu strain is not responsible for killing hardly anyone....... remember..... it was always the "other underlying health conditions" that is killing the H1N1 victims. Let us also not forget that the common flu is more deadly according to the MSM. Flu vaccinations have never been made mandatory as this one is now.
Who's blowing what out of proportion here? In this particular thread it would appear the the hospitals in New York are. This is based on factual evidence supplied in the OP.
Cigarette smoking causes about 1 of every 5 deaths in the United States each year.1,6 Cigarette smoking is estimated to cause the following:1
Originally posted by fleabit
Um.. there is a connection there. The most at risk are: those with underlying medical conditions. Now.. who is most likely to be at a hospital? Yes... those with underlying medical conditions.
If my wife were pregnant... would I want her at a hospital where the staff has been vaccinated, or one that has not? It's a no-brainer.
Not that this is the only reason they are doing it. With a lessened health staff, they are trying to prevent a crisis if it blew up come this fall. I mean c'mon.. in the last few months, many hospitals have been overrun with people with common colds, freaking out because they think they have swine flu. During flu season.. imagine how much worse it will be. And that some of the staff will not come in. And if half of what was left were out with the flu... well, you get the idea.
A hospital is only useful if there is a staff running it.
Originally posted by Revealation
PUCKY, my wife is doing fine, That's why I'm trying to do the leg work for her, along with all the help which everyone has contributed, for which I'm greatful. Thanks.
I'll be back, I have to do homework with the kids and give my eyes a break for a few. Peace.