9-11 will be uncovered this year !

hi, i'm member of some channeling inc, wchich i don't want to disclose, and this is a piece from their 2009 forecast, i always wondered what it would be until Jones-Sheen business came out

here what they say:

A Hue and Cry to Prosecute George Bush & Company
It is seen that certain information will be released about George Bush and his regime and whereas in the past clemency would be given to a former president and cabinet members, there will be a hue and cry against these people and that many will demand that they be prosecuted and charged and punished for that which they caused to happen. This hue and cry, this finding of the voice of the people will grow as the year advances and it is seen that it will continue to grow into the near 2010. This will be a finding of the political strengths and power of the people and a beginning to establishing a new order for the people, by the people, and of the people

I hope they are right. NYC CAN just got the independant 9/11 investigation on the ballot. Maybe, someone will spill the beans before that gets voted on. I highly suggest that someone spills the beans to save their own butt.

apparently 'architects and engineers' demanding investigation as well

www.youtube.com...

reply to post by angelx666


I know that the FBI's counter terrorism division have recieved the information from AE4T, consider it credible and have promised to look into it.

If you appreciate the work they are doing, you should consider becoming, like me, a sustaining contributor (you can give as little as 10 bucks a month).

Gage is "engaged" in this full time and has given up his job as an architect to pursue this path.

And soon, their number, of professionally registered engineers and architects will reach 1000+, which represents a real milestone and a powerful force to be reckoned with, because it includes high rise structural P.E.'s, some with over 30, 40 years experience.

you must be out of your mind

the upcoming event will forever erase any memory of 911

this is planned out

today pay respects where respects due

to our departed

reply to post by angelx666


I truly hope so, most of us who have years of research into 911 knows the buck stop at the Bush administration. We know certain people in the Bush administration are responsible for 911; most of the evidences support it.

It will be a great day in America when the 911 truth and the real culprits are brought to justices. I would not have fought so hard for the truth if I did not believe we could win. We owe it to the victims and their families, “they want justices,” and we will help them get it.
I find it appalling that there is no accountability in our government anymore. I really believe people high up in our government have forgotten they work for we the people not the other way round, we the corporations. The elected officials made promises to we the people, once they were voted in office. These politicians have been ignoring their promises to we the people and have only been supporting big corporations such as Health care, big Parma, bail outs for the banking cartel, oil and gas corporations and what war contracts their political parties can get for their war profiteering friend such as Halliburton, KBR, Black water, and the likes.

To prove the facts to my above statement it was Nancy Pelosi house speaker, when running for office she said: if I win this election, I will seek impeachment against President George Bush, for lying to the American people about WMD and the illegal wirer taping on the American people. However, when she was voted in the fist televised hearing on capital hill Nancy Pelosi said that the impeachment proceeding were off the table. This was one of the biggest betrayals to the American people, a slap in our faces.
Because of what she did I can no longer trust any politician running for office again in the United States? Nancy Pelosi won her election by lying to the American people who voted her in, to some of us she is a traitor to this country. Nancy Pelosi has had plenty of opportunities to impeach George Bush, instead she protect him, why?

Blocking of impeachment proceedings against Bush
In the wake of George W. Bush's reelection in 2004, several leading House Democrats believed that Democrats should pursue impeachment proceedings against the president. They asserted that Bush had misled Congress about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, and had violated the civil liberties of Americans by authorizing wiretaps without a warrant.
In May 2006, with an eye on the upcoming Congressional elections—which offered the possibility of Democrats taking back control of the House for the first time since 1994—Pelosi told colleagues that, while the Democrats would conduct vigorous oversight of Bush administration policy, an impeachment investigation was "off the table". (A week earlier, she had told the Washington Post that, although Democrats would not set out to impeach the president, "you never know where" investigations might lead.)[19]
After becoming Speaker of the House in January 2007, Pelosi held firm against impeachment, notwithstanding strong support for that course of action among constituents in her home district. In the November 2008 election, Pelosi withstood a challenge for her seat by antiwar activist Cindy Sheehan, who ran as an independent primarily because of Pelosi's refusal to pursue impeachment.

en.wikipedia.org...

I wanted to add here was an opportunity for Nancy Pelosi to do her job again, instead she betrayed the American people to protect a criminal.

Kucinich presents articles of impeachment against Bush

www.seattlepoliticore.org...

A boisterous crowd has already gathered for today's hearing in the House Judiciary Committee on the case for impeaching Presidnent Bush and Vice President Cheney.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) has been leading the charge on the issue, and although Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers (D-Mich.) have said there will be no formal impeachment hearings, they've given Kucinich and his allies a session today to make the case.

www.cbsnews.com...

At least one head needs to roll and I think it will be Cheney's, but only over the torture, then again George Tenet would have to be included in that.

For 9/11, 100 people would need to be prosecuted and it's just not going to happen.

But, if the historical record on it can be rendered accurate, or based in reality, then a generation or two from now, people WILL learn, and learn from it, about what NOT to do and how NOT to be, and that serves the victims I think, in the form of historical learning. There's value in that.

And at some level that process has been happening, behind the scenes I think for sure, thanks in no small part to the efforts of the 9/11 Truth Movement, for keeping it front and center on the table all these years.

Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by angelx666

 

We know certain people in the Bush administration are responsible for 911; most of the evidences support it.

Where are your sources proving this?

Originally posted by stevegmu

Originally posted by impressme
reply to post by angelx666

 

We know certain people in the Bush administration are responsible for 911; most of the evidences support it.

Where are your sources proving this?

I'll give you a hint...start by picking any of the thousand 911 threads on ATS. Read down a few posts and it won't be long until you find someone that's provided a factual piece of evidence that proves enough to warrant a new investigation.

Get going, you've got a lot of reading to do

reply to post by stevegmu


Here, I just proved it in another thread.

Originally posted by OmegaPoint
Free fall in air would be about 10 seconds or so. Buildings went down in anywhere from 12 to 14 seconds, so to within a mere couple seconds or a few seconds of absolute free fall, all the while ejecting this fountain-like cascade of debris, all the way to the ground, without any loss of momentum.

The OCT (official conspiracy theory) as to what happened there I like to call "The Foot of God Hypothesis".

This post I made in another thread illustrates the point I'm trying to make here.

Originally posted by OmegaPoint

Originally posted by rogerstigers
A little digging got me this:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/files/078735889fb727a7.jpg[/atsimg]

The real question is, how did all that implode and explode and go from top to bottom to within mere seconds of absolute FREE FALL in nothing but air..? with all the material blowing out in a plume of exploding debris, some firing large pieces of steel into the adjacent American express building and into the Winter Garden Atrium five hundred feet away - all the way to the ground WITHOUT ANY LOSS OF MOMENTUM???

Absent the use of explosives severing everything beneath the descending debris wave, that is..

[edit on 10-9-2009 by OmegaPoint]

Sir Isaac Newton's Three Laws of Motion

www.grc.nasa.gov...

Another interesting aspect, is that the North Tower was impacted around the 95 floor (of 110), and yet precisely the same phenomenon occured, again, all the way to the ground, without any loss of momentum. Absent explosives, that is impossible.

Regarding the North Tower, here's a little graphic which further illustrates the point



And so, since the second case, is through nothing but air, or in short, nothing at all, it is ONLY within the DIFFERENCE (mere seconds) wherein every "breakage" would have to occur, throughout the remaining length of structure and that would be probably as fast or faster than the speed of sound, or in short ALL AT ONCE. This is absurd.

Here is yet another way of looking at it

Case 1: Free-fall time of a billiard ball dropped from the roof of WTC1, in a vacuum:


Case 2: Progressive free fall in ten-floor intervals:


Case 3: Progressive free fall in one-floor intervals


And in those cases, that is operating on the basis of floors being suspended in mid air, with no columnar support structure at all, such that the next fall time commences at the point of impact, like a series of dominos suspended in mid air one above the other.

Videos of destruction

911research.wtc7.net...

[edit on 10-9-2009 by OmegaPoint]

Edit to add video of first hand eyewitness testimony of explosions

Google Video Link

There, I think that completes the picture.

Does this name Bush and Cheney? No, not quite, unless it could be proven that this was the catastrophic and catalyzing event called for a year prior by Cheney in the PNAC Document, and, that they were accomplices in a conspiracy to committ mass murder by criminal negligence and cover up..

[edit on 11-9-2009 by OmegaPoint]

reply to post by stevegmu

We know certain people in the Bush administration are responsible for 911; most of the evidences support it.

Where are your sources proving this?

Let’s start with these:

Was the Bush Administration Complicit in the 911 Terrorist Attacks

www.scribd.com...

Foremost 9/11 Whistleblower Discusses Possibility Attack Was Inside Job
Edmonds agrees weight of evidence leans towards criminal complicity

www.prisonplanet.com...

Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up
Former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh slammed the 9/11 Commission Thursday saying it ignored – or "summarily rejected" – the most critical piece of intelligence that could have prevented the horrific attacks of September 11, 2001

archive.newsmax.com...

9/11 Panel Suspected Deception by Pentagon
Allegations Brought to Inspectors General

Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public rather than a reflection of the fog of events on that day, according to sources involved in the debate.
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission, hoping to hide the

www.washingtonpost.com...

9/11 panel distrusted Pentagon testimony
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A member of the 9/11 commission said Wednesday that panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the Pentagon's inspector general.

www.cnn.com...

"The president ought to be ashamed"
Former Sen. Max Cleland blasts Bush's "Nixonian" stonewalling of the 9/11 commission, his "lies" about Iraq, and his flight-suit photo op on the USS Lincoln after "hiding out" during Vietnam.

dir.salon.com...

The Covered-Up Meeting

www.washingtonpost.com.../columns

John M. Cole, Former Veteran Intelligence Operations Specialist; FBI - Mr. Cole worked for 18 years in
the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division as an Intelligence Operations specialist, and was in charge of FBI’s
foreign intelligence investigations covering India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. Mr. Cole had knowledge of
certain activities that directly related to the terror attacks on September 11, 2001. He notified the 9/11
Commission during its investigation, but never received a response. His name and contact information was
provided to the Commission as a key witness by other witnesses, but he was never contacted or interviewed

www.nswbc.org...

Leading 9/11 Widows Declare 9/11 Commission A Whitewash

www.911truth.org...

Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation

www.opednews.com...

"Burning Questions...Need Answers": FE's Bill Manning Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse

www.fireengineering.com...

Tower Blueprints

911research.wtc7.net...

There Will Be No Patrick Fitzgerald for the 9/11 Attacks
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by James Ridgeway
Members of the 9/11 Commission made news this week by including serious criticisms of the Bush Administration in their latest "progress report." At a public forum on November 14, former 9/11 Commissioners chastised the White House for failing to implement recommendations aimed at preventing another terrorist attack, made some 16 months ago in the 9/11 Commission Report. They also pointed to new problems -- including the mistreatment of detainees, which they say might aid in terrorist recruitment. “The flames of extremism undoubtedly burn more brightly when we are the ones who deliver the gasoline,” said Commission member Richard Ben-Veniste.

www.buzzflash.com...

Classified Letters Regarding FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds

www.thememoryhole.org...

Our Broken System

by Sibel Edmonds

antiwar.com...

Did the Bush Administration Lie to Congress and the 9/11 Commission?
9/11: Missing Black Boxes in World Trade Center Attacks Found by Firefighters, Analyzed by NTSB, Concealed by FBI
By DAVE LINDORFF

www.counterpunch.org...

Tape of Air Traffic Controllers Made on 9/11 Was Destroyed

www.nytimes.com...:search?

How Osama Cracked FBI's Top 10

www.wired.com...

Crooked Cops and 9-11

georgewashington.blogspot.com...

Presidential Hopeful Dennis Kucinich Calls for 9/11 Truth at DC Protest.

www.911blogger.com...

Former Reagan Deputy and Colonel Says 9/11 "Dog That Doesn't Hunt"

www.propagandamatrix.com...

Respected Leaders and Families Launch 9/11 Truth Statement Demanding Deeper Investigation into the Events of 9/11

www.911truth.org...

Former FBI Translator Sibel Edmonds Calls Current 9/11 Investigation Inadequate

baltimorechronicle.com...

CIA Analyst Discusses Possible Cheney 9/11 Stand-down Order.

video.google.com...#

Looks to me that there is enough proof of a massive cover-up in the Bush administration only someone in total DENIAL cant see that. Would you like more proof I can pull up eight years of cover-up and proven lies. Looks to me all the evidences points to the Bush administration and the main conspirators in helping to cover-up this crime was the FBI.