It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by stevegmu
The administration has spotters in the audience- like V.I. Lenin and J. Stalin did when they gave speeches. They took note of those who didn't cheer loud enough, and dealt with them later. In this case, the Dems who didn't cheer enough would not receive help when up for re-election.
I would love to see a source on this, otherwise it's a very inflammatory lie.
Why is something like this tolerated on this sight?
Originally posted by stevegmu
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Originally posted by stevegmu
The administration has spotters in the audience- like V.I. Lenin and J. Stalin did when they gave speeches. They took note of those who didn't cheer loud enough, and dealt with them later. In this case, the Dems who didn't cheer enough would not receive help when up for re-election.
I would love to see a source on this, otherwise it's a very inflammatory lie.
Why is something like this tolerated on this sight?
I spent a number of years on the Hill, and have many friends and associates who are still in the game. I am my own source. Regardless, this is a conspiracy site. Many topics can not be backed by hard 'evidence.'
Sight?