Annunaki Moon Base

Originally posted by kyleplatinum
Since you mention the stars, like I posted earlier...they are in a pattern?
weird.... they go all the way accross like that?

Note on Fiducial Marks

What are those little cross hairs in Apollo photographs?

The technical term is a FIDUCIAL .They are etched onto a sheet of glass , known as a RESEAU PLATE.

Excerpt

"The lunar surface Hasselblad cameras were fitted with a device called a reseau plate. The reseau plate is a clear glass plate on which is etched small black cross hairs, called "fiducials" by some and "reticles" by others. As each film frame is drawn into place, it is pressed against the reseau plate so that the picture is taken through the plate. This results in an image of the fiducials being superimposed over the image focused through the lens.

A reseau grid is used in the science of photogrammetry to establish a geometrical basis for measuring objects in photographs. It can be used to correct for any misalignment of the film in the camera, or distortions in the image after development or electronic scanning. Since the location of the marks on the reseau plate is known with great precision, correcting for distortion is a simple matter of manipulating the image until the marks are in the correct location."

SOURCE - PHOTOGRAPHY Cross hairs
www.clavius.org...

Originally posted by wycky
Hi OP,
Can you please upload the actual images you worked on so we can get a good look, instead of looking at a low res video?

Its been posted several times

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by Skanna
Funny thing with that movie is, because colour photos from Clementine are very similar (almost the same) to his vision of Moon. But, there is one difference - Clementine photos contain wider spectrum then our eyes can see (UV,IR, etc).

The USGS site has them as UV/VIS VIS standing for visible spectrum. The USGS says the images are in natural viewing 'slightly enhanced' by UV and IR. But believe what you wish Been down this road once to many times over the last few years


Revealed for the First Time Color Images of the Moon from Clementine Satellite
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Annunaki Moon Base

what is your evidence for this claim ?

i will hoold back my comments on your " technique " and alleged sigtings till that has been answered

Everyone seems to be saying the same thing but no evidence. That 'spaceship' is a rock not a huge huge huge NASA shaped craft.

The red box is housing a line in the rock, this line goes over the 'spaceship' and continues onto the rock 'behind' it. Oh no wait.... it's one continuous rock formation. The line in the rock shows that the ship and background are the same rock. The line even stops where the crater bends round on the left and covers it... like it should.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f3ca4faa0044.jpg[/atsimg]

Great stuff homie

S&F

Take easy on the chemo and all the best man

Some of the modified pics are pretty, but have you ever looked at the moon through a telescope?

I can assure you that it's pretty much a monochrome sort of place.

Originally posted by zorgon
The USGS site has them as UV/VIS VIS standing for visible spectrum. The USGS says the images are in natural viewing 'slightly enhanced' by UV and IR. But believe what you wish

Been down this road once to many times over the last few years

Im not trying to convince You to anything - because its probably impossible
But, if anyone else will read that post, for me its pretty simple (and it dont matter what I belive or not):

VIS = visible. But UV+etc is not. Thats why Clementine photos was "made" like this:
Left side - VIS, Middle - "UV and rest", Right - UV/VIS
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...
nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov...

Same example at USGS site about Clementine:
astrogeology.usgs.gov...

So yeah, in some point it is a "slightly enhanced" reality - but that make a huge difference. On wider area:

Moon "as it is" - which means, what we can see with our/human eyes. Black, dark grey, grey, dark brown, white and sometimes mild blue (at craters - minerals). And even your "proves" show that:
VIS:
www.freewebs.com...

UV/VIS, with light brown, dark green, bright yellow, glowing blue on EVERY crater+ few other colors:
www.thelivingmoon.com...

And btw, in the topic you give a link to, all of your links are dead - they follow to your old site.

Escamillas movie is fun to watch - but thats all. Spacecraft of LA size + humanoid of 1/5 LA size...(craft from this thread is tiny when compared) Small, blue (in UV/VIS), fresh craters compared to "orbs" in Tether Accident...and many others - sorry, Im not buying it. Question is, how Escamilla know, how the Moon look in UV/VIS - and explanation "I took grey pixel from moon, then find the same on Earth, and then I have put colour from Earth on Moon" is just...well...weird. The less weird would be explanation, that he have saw Clementine photos before he made that movie. And from the date of photos in PDS (2000), ( pdsimage2.wr.usgs.gov... ), that explanation is imho better. But maybe he didnt know that are VIS/UV photos, so in his movie its "real, live colours of Moon".

My 0.02 (and sorry for my English - Im not native speaker)

something i noticed....there are stars in the original photo, you rarely see stars in the background of moon photos because they are blotted out...perhaps they didn't get a chance to/didn't think they'd need to erase the backgrounds on it and that is why there is so much hidden information in the original image... just my two cents...

TGG

If we could only see the dark side of the moon

reply to post by danhow


There is no "dark side" of the Moon.

And, you can easily find examples of photographs of the farside, if you search.

Originally posted by danhow
If we could only see the dark side of the moon

Like old Weedwacker says, there is no dark side of the moon! Every part of the moon has two weeks of day and two weeks of night.

Originally posted by The Parallelogram
Some of the modified pics are pretty, but have you ever looked at the moon through a telescope?

That's what I was wondering also. To be honest, I don't think I have ever looked at the moon through a telescope (as a kid I did but with a cheap one) but it seems like people who do would see these things. If they were up there moving around.

I think there are secrets being kept from us about life in space, just not sure this is it.

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
Like old Weedwacker says,

Old? And he let you live?



OF COURSE there is a dark side... its wherever the sun don't shine for a couple weeks

Originally posted by Strictsum
That's what I was wondering also. To be honest, I don't think I have ever looked at the moon through a telescope (as a kid I did but with a cheap one) but it seems like people who do would see these things.

Well I hate to leave you with a deprived childhood... you can look through Mike's 10 inch scope here

BIG PICTURE

Originally posted by blupblup
I can't believe this crap has got 74 flags??
While decent, interesting and thought provoking threads go more or less unread...

Yup I hear ya Just ran into that in one of my threads... got told 'it's childish to argue' and 'everyone knows this'

So I think I needz to do more threadz like this one I have some great pics of Alien Moon Bases on the Dark Side



And this one is on the Bright Side...



NO WAY these can be debunked

So will SOMEONE tell me how we know this one in the OP is ANNUNAKI

2nd photo? Of course it can be debunked

Its the image from Clementine, and can be found
here
1 pixel = 1km, so that means that "object" would have ~50x35km, and since its on near side, it would be clearly visible from earth with even amateur telescope. The "object" is at Mare Fecunditatis , and two craters next to "building" is double-crater Messier

Here some photos of it:
www.damianpeach.com...
i28.tinypic.com...
i27.tinypic.com...

And, acording that the "object" is stretched between borders of photos, that made mosaic image, its probably nothing more then graphic bug

And for the first photo - please give source of it.


[edit on 4-9-2009 by Skanna]

reply to post by zorgon

I always thought that first picture was a hoax created by Disney? Are you saying it's real?

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by zorgon

 

I always thought that first picture was a hoax created by Disney? Are you saying it's real?

Created by Disney?... yes
Hoax?... no
Real?... yes


You get me an answer on the Annunaki and I will tell you more about Disney




[edit on 4-9-2009 by zorgon]

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Mintwithahole.
reply to post by zorgon

 

I always thought that first picture was a hoax created by Disney? Are you saying it's real?

Created by Disney?... yes
Hoax?... no
Real?... yes


You get me an answer on the Annunaki and I will tell you more about Disney

[edit on 4-9-2009 by zorgon]

I have no idea what all this Annunaki stuff is all about. Sorry. . . But I would be eternally grateful if you could post a link to some information about that Disney picture.

Heh, I dont need source anymore - found it:

en.wikipedia.org...
And I really dont know, how to debunk a...Disney movie from 1955
5:15 here


[edit on 4-9-2009 by Skanna]

amazing find, and great work.

You are in my prayers.