It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr No One
I am just suggesting that people keep an open mind and learn to question the "facts" that they are fed by the mainstream. Feel free to keep your mind closed if you like.
Originally posted by Kano
Well to find out that the Earth is hollow would mean that a large range of modern science is utterly false. Sciences that have been studied and built upon for centuries. Without a single shred of evidence that goes against the modern theories.
"Any Good Scientist" would also know that there is a point where the 'anything is possible' argument becomes stupidity. Thinking that 'ooh the Earth could still be hollow' is not keeping an open mind. It is wasting time and generally foolish. "Any Good Scientist" would tell you about a chap named Occam, and just how useless this kind of reasoning is.
For example, through two data points in a diagram you can always draw a straight line, and induce that all further observations will lie on that line. However, you could also draw an infinite variety of the most complicated curves passing through those same two points, and these curves would fit the empirical data just as well. Only Occam's razor would in this case guide you in choosing the "straight" (i.e. linear) relation as best candidate model. A similar reasoning can be made for n data points lying in any kind of distribution.
Originally posted by kinglizard
Originally posted by Mr No One
I am just suggesting that people keep an open mind and learn to question the "facts" that they are fed by the mainstream. Feel free to keep your mind closed if you like.
My mind is not �closed� it�s open to repeatable scientific evidence witch I have presented to you and this forum. You continue to say its just theory when sound science and study says otherwise. You say to �keep an open mind� to the utterly absurd and to ignore factual science, I would say that you are the one with the closed mind.
Originally posted by Mr No OneIt is never a waste of time to consider a possibility. The principle of parsimony is only used to help find the most probable outcome - not the one true answer.
Originally posted by kinglizard
My mind is not �closed� it�s open to repeatable scientific evidence witch I have presented to you and this forum.
Originally posted by Mr No One
First, I think you meant reputable not repeatable - just because you say it again doesn't make it right.
In all probability, the Earth is solid there remains, however, the possibility that it is hollow. Until we have irrefutable proof one way or another, both possibilities remain.
Originally posted by kinglizard
The mass of the moon has a direct effect on the oceanic tidal movements on earth. If the moon was hollow scientists would have found out by the gravitational pull. I don�t feel like searching out this info, maybe somebody else could find relevant information on the net.
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by Mr No One
(I'm not saying it means its hollow either, but we can't PROVE one or the other).
I kind of think that we can. Certainly there is ample evidence that the Earth is not hollow.
The hollow moon theory has never been seriously accepted by anyone. There have been numerous theories on the origin of the moon, but the latest (the big splat) manages to tie in all of the loose ends, the lunar motion, the orbit, the lunar mass, and most importantly, the composition of the lunar rocks retieved by the Apollo missions.
How do you propose to prove the earth is solid? Have you been to the center? And when you were there, did you take pictures of a moltin core?
Think about it. If the earth's core was truly moltin do you think you could walk on the surface? What temp do they say the core is? Dont you think that, that heat would of "Leached" out to the outter core by now? Or maybe the earth has some sort of "Air Conditioner" somewhere down there, cooling things off before it heated the surface. Do you have pictures of that? Do you really believe the north and south pole could have ice on it if it were true?
This is for you to prove to us. I dont know about the others here at ATS, but for me I need hard core proof, not some mumbo jumbo from some ancient secret society member, selling me more snake oil.
Originally posted by amantine
It is called tidal lock. The gravity of the earth affects the rotation of the moon in such a way that the rotation relative to the earth slows down and eventually stops. The same side is always turned to the earth then.
Tides and Gravitational Locking
Earth-Moon system: Tidal lock
Originally posted by genesiss
lets put this in basic terms,, science says that we prove something by the same thing happening again and again under a test,, so.. are there any other moons that orbit our other planets with the same behavior?
Originally posted by amantine
It is called tidal lock. The gravity of the earth affects the rotation of the moon in such a way that the rotation relative to the earth slows down and eventually stops. The same side is always turned to the earth then.
Originally posted by outsider
While it's very unlikely the Earth is hollow, it's big enough to have large holes. I've been in a few little caverns that are not really so little.
Originally posted by kinglizard
Also the Moon is slowly but surely moving away from the Earth by 3.8 centimeters a year. In several million years it will look much smaller than today and at some point will just be a dot in the night sky.
Dont you think that, that heat would of "Leached" out to the outter core by now?