It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Dutch national museum said Thursday that one of its prized possessions, a rock supposedly brought back from the moon by U.S. astronauts, is just a piece of petrified wood.
Rijksmuseum spokeswoman Xandra van Gelder, who oversaw the investigation that proved the piece was a fake, said the museum will keep it anyway as a curiosity.
"It's a good story, with some questions that are still unanswered," she said. "We can laugh about it."
The museum acquired the rock after the death of former Prime Minister Willem Drees in 1988. Drees received it as a private gift on Oct. 9, 1969 from then-U.S. ambassador J. William Middendorf during a visit by the three Apollo 11 astronauts, part of their "Giant Leap" goodwill tour after the first moon landing.
Researchers from Amsterdam's Free University said they could see at a glance the rock was probably not from the moon. They followed the initial appraisal up with extensive testing.
Originally posted by Lasheic
Further, this adds confirmation to the moon landing event - because we have and have tested moon rocks to deduce their properties and composition.
Originally posted by Lasheic
Further, this adds confirmation to the moon landing event - because we have and have tested moon rocks to deduce their properties and composition.
Originally posted by ngchunter
...if a university geologist can quickly uncover a fake moon rock given by a diplomat who isn't even sure where he got it from, then it proves that if the other rocks are fake that experts could quickly uncover the forgery when examining the rocks. It directly proves that fake rocks can't slip by experts...
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by ngchunter
The only reason this was "easily detected" was because it's a lump of wood.
I'd hazard a guess and say anyone with a geological degree or training could tell.
Anyhoo, you seem to have taken a different tack to what I was alluding too. Namely, that Lasheic said that this was confirmation of the moon landing events. My question was, how can a lump of pretrified wood be seen as confirmation?
The "rock" had originally been been vetted through a phone call to Nasa, she added.
The US agency gave moon rocks to more than 100 countries following lunar missions in the 1970s.
BBC
Originally posted by stumason
If anything, a piece of petrified wood given to anybody by NASA and told it was moon rock should set alarm bells ringing, not reinforce the case for a moon landing.
It's like somone giving you a rare flower that they said they got from some
isolated place, only to find out 40 years later it is in fact a plastic flower, then saying "Oh, well, they must still have gone to this rare place, this plastic flower, that was made in China, is proof"..
Originally posted by Phage
It should also be noted that the note to Drees from Middendorf (displayed with the rock) says nothing about it being a moon rock.