New View on Nick Berg

The American government, if they did this, took a huge gamble.. They could lose backing for the war or they could gain it.
Dont forget though, that this has taken everyone's eye off Abu Ghraihb? the prison abuse case.

Originally posted by browha
The American government, if they did this, took a huge gamble.. They could lose backing for the war or they could gain it.
Dont forget though, that this has taken everyone's eye off Abu Ghraihb? the prison abuse case.

Really, where?

The prisoner mishandling is a bigger news story than the beheading of Nick Berg.

Maybe things are different over wherever you are?

Originally posted by browha

Dont forget though, that this has taken everyone's eye off Abu Ghraihb? the prison abuse case.

Im with you on that. I think after the American people seen the execution video they somehow forget how bad we treated those Iraqi prisoners because we did not do anything AS bad as what these Iraqi extremist did to Nick Berg.

Originally posted by COOL HAND

Originally posted by browha
The American government, if they did this, took a huge gamble.. They could lose backing for the war or they could gain it.
Dont forget though, that this has taken everyone's eye off Abu Ghraihb? the prison abuse case.

Really, where?

The prisoner mishandling is a bigger news story than the beheading of Nick Berg.

Maybe things are different over wherever you are?

Oh right.. I'm in the UK at the moment, and I've only heard about the Daily Mirror editor getting sacked and Nick Berg since it happened.... Not even news about the prisoner release

Originally posted by specialasianX
Just a thought on this, and i'm not defending the USA (thats the last thing i want to do), but if it was the CIA or someone doing it for the benefit of the US, why would they ahve said that they offered the captive in exchange for prisoners in Abu Ghraib, that statement makes the USA look bad, but why would someone doing this on the USA's behalf want to make the USA look bad? Maybe they did for realism purposes, i personally think it was insurgents but i dont think it was the guy they blame...

Just like the Republican and Democrat virtual standoff there are CIA and FBI factions that play one against the other. It doesn't have to seem logical for an American group to offer up this stuff that could make America look bad. If a faction can benefit from an administration coming down, it's expected that they'd do it. The problem with viewing media coverage and thinking "we wouldn't do that" is that we don't think about the darkness and the nuance. The simple truth and answer and truth may be the most likely when it comes to public crime and justice...but I think it's exactly the opposite when it comes to Politicians.

Here's a site that has some information about the "white chair " being compared to both the chairs Nick and whatever her name was at the prison that they were both sitting in , and it also talks about the westerner voice and the " may he rest in peace ".



breakfornews.com...

for thoose of you who dont or wont believe the american government would kill one of its own i suggest you get yourself a copy of the attack on the world trade centres 9/11..it didnt only kill one but 3500...viva democracy..the government of the u.s.a is free to kll as many as it wants with impunity, and the nationality dont matter..why, because YOU live in a free country..and i dont believe nick berg was in any way innocent..the coincidence of the terrorist using HIS pc is just toooooooooooooooooo great. maybe he was just another of americas patsys and all this was planned with precision a long time ago..