It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thedman
That is because Asians are supposedly smarter than other ethnic groups
So what happened to you?
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by thedman
That is because Asians are supposedly smarter than other ethnic groups
So what happened to you?
I can't say that the truther movement affects any ethnic group more or less than it does any other ethnic group. There are gullible people that will believe ridiculous things pretty much everywhere, regardless of race. If there are space aliens out there somewhere, some of them are going to be gullible too.
Come to think of it, don't the Scientologists think that Xenu galactic warlord gathered up billions of aliens and murdered them by throwing them into volcanos here on Earth? I'm sure Xenu had to have used some form of trickery to get the more obstinate aliens to show up for volcano day.
Nathan S. Lomba, BS CE, PE, SE, M.ASCE – Licensed Professional Civil Engineer, State of California. Licensed Professional Civil and Structural Engineer, State of Idaho. Experience ranges from custom residential to heavy industrial structures. Major project involvements include: Lead civil/structural engineer on a $700 million project for the U.S. Air Force; structural design engineer for a 41,000 sq. ft. Pulp Machine Building; and Resident Engineer on a 550 MW Natural-gas fired power plant. Member, American Concrete Institute (ACI). Member, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Charter Member, Structural Engineering Institute (SEI). Professional Member, American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). 39 years experience.
* Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:
"I began having doubts about, so called, official explanations for the collapse of the WTC towers soon after the explanations surfaced. The gnawing question that lingers in my mind is: How did the structures collapse in near symmetrical fashion when the apparent precipitating causes were asymmetrical loading? The collapses defies common logic from an elementary structural engineering perspective. “If” you accept the argument that fire protection covering was damaged to such an extent that structural members in the vicinity of the aircraft impacts were exposed to abnormally high temperatures, and “if” you accept the argument that the temperatures were high enough to weaken the structural framing, that still does not explain the relatively concentric nature of the failures.
Neither of the official precipitating sources for the collapses, namely the burning aircraft, were centered within the floor plan of either tower; both aircraft were off-center when they finally came to rest within the respective buildings. This means that, given the foregoing assumptions, heating and weakening of the structural framing would have been constrained to the immediate vicinity of the burning aircraft. Heat transmission (diffusion) through the steel members would have been irregular owing to differing sizes of the individual members; and, the temperature in the members would have dropped off precipitously the further away the steel was from the flames—just as the handle on a frying pan doesn't get hot at the same rate as the pan on the burner of the stove. These factors would have resulted in the structural framing furthest from the flames remaining intact and possessing its full structural integrity, i.e., strength and stiffness.
Structural steel is highly ductile, when subjected to compression and bending it buckles and bends long before reaching its tensile or shear capacity. Under the given assumptions, “if” the structure in the vicinity of either burning aircraft started to weaken, the superstructure above would begin to lean in the direction of the burning side. The opposite, intact, side of the building would resist toppling until the ultimate capacity of the structure was reached, at which point, a weak-link failure would undoubtedly occur. Nevertheless, the ultimate failure mode would have been a toppling of the upper floors to one side—much like the topping of a tall redwood tree—not a concentric, vertical collapse.
For this reason alone, I rejected the official explanation for the collapse of the WTC towers out of hand. Subsequent evidence supporting controlled, explosive demolition of the two buildings are more in keeping with the observed collapse modalities and only serve to validate my initial misgivings as to the causes for the structural failures. " www.ae911truth.org...
Originally posted by thedman
That is because Asians are supposedly smarter than other ethnic groups
So what happened to you?
Originally posted by WWu777
These people are NOT gullible. They have many years, some 40+ years of experience in structural engineering.
posted by acrux
Was questioned very critically in Japanese Parliament
Google Video Link |
posted by WWu777
These people are NOT gullible. They have many years, some 40+ years of experience in structural engineering.
posted by GoodOlDave
It doesn't make any difference if they have 40+ years of experience, can recite the periodic table of elements by heart, or if they invented the number seven. If anyone honestly believes those stupid web sites that say the planes that hit the towers were really holograms and there really were no planes, then pinch yourself, it's true- they're being gullible.
Originally posted by SPreston
Good going Dave. Your dishonesty precedes you.
There was not one word about holograms and no planes in the post of WWu777 was there Dave?
As usual you inserted one of your 'strawman arguments' and argued against yourself didn't you Dave? Shame on you Dave. What is it that has you fanatically defending the 9-11 perpetrators, even if you have to lie and invent your own version of evidence?