It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by majestictwo
Originally posted by Big Oil
reply to post by dgtempe
I agree with that theory 100%
Why, because earlier this year I noticed the air had a sort of aerosol smell to it and my lungs were being raped by some kind of chemical agent that was causing me to cough a lot.
The government has been doing this for awhile to get our bodies severely weakened for the H1N1 vaccine.
Very disturbing indeed – the most harm you will come to is a nervous breakdown over worrying about contrals.
MJ2
More than 75 cents of every dollar spent on health care in this country goes toward treatment of chronic diseases such as heart disease, diabetes, cancer and asthma. Chronic diseases also are the leading cause of death and disability in the United States
Originally posted by questioningall
you are correct in your information.
Amazing, how there are those who are still denying ignorance about this topic. But, those are people who deny everything, anyway.
Chemtrails are so obvious, how they stay in the sky and form into clouds and stay around.
I still enjoy watching contrails, as planes fly high overhead and the small contrail disappears behind them.
Besides there are many many pictures of planes with the nozzles and up close pictures of planes spraying chemtrails.
But again, there are those, will will deny everything - because that is what they do, but at least most of us, have denied ignorance, compared to those others.
Yes, I will always laugh at those, who are so obvious at denying the truth and facts.
Originally posted by cranberrydork
Originally posted by JustG
Therefore, could you show me some evidence 'here' that clouds form w/o some form of dust particle.
That level of ignorance about basic 'stuff' is alarming.
To another poster....The increase in air traffic since 1975 is staggering. Also, memories are notoriously poor......
1. Why do some planes leave trails that last minutes while others last an hour when they've passed at the same time.
2. Explain the formation of clouds w/o particles.
The truth is there - yet some people are so completely Ignorant...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Thanks for that, it's a question that is raised constantly, and without an understanding of the Aispace System, Air Traffic Control, and the facts of flying jet airplanes, then people draw incorrect assumptions based on what they think they see.
It is doubtful that anyone can accurately judge the altitude of a jet passing overhead at between 6 to 7 miles. Airplanes, today, at higher altitudes are only separated by 1,000 feet vertically. That's a change just in the last several years, previously it was 2,000 feet, when above 29,000 (in the USA).
Anyway, at 6 miles away, 1,000 foot difference can't be determined with the naked eye. When you see two airplanes, seemingly flying with each other, they are at different altitudes. AND the air, the Relative Humidity, will be different too. THAT is why you may see one contrail form, and remain...it basically triggers the formation of OTHER clouds, othr cirrus clouds, as that is what they're called at those altitudes. SOMETHING was going to trigger the cloud formation, eventually. The conditions were ripe -- the jet just boosts it along.
Non sequitor. For water vapor to condense into a liquid form, it needs something. It will condense onto a surface, like your car window, or a blade of grass. OR a microscopic particle...dust, soot, whatever it finds.
Vapor can exist in super-cooled air, well below the freezing temperature. When it condenses in those conditions, it immediatly freezes, of course, forming the ice crystals that comprise high-altitude cloud types. AND contrails!
See, science isn't difficult. It just isn't emphasized enough, it seems, in some schools anymore. What a shame.
Interesting because I was going to point out that the 'chem'trail planes usually fly quite a bit lower than the 'con'trail leaving.
I would imagine you would then blame it on humidity. Ok. But, would that be consistent? For example, if the 'chem'trails are present because of humidity levels, then we shouldn't see them in arid regions that get hardly any rain.
...back off debunkers...isn't about proving chemtrails real or not...