It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Obama continues to defend the expansion of U.S. military operations in Latin America, but against what threat?
Barack Obama continues to defend the expansion of U.S. military operations in Latin America, arguing that the U.S. is not establishing bases in Colombia but simply extending existing agreements with the country.
In Colombia, this renaming is part of the Uribe administration's strategy to slide the agreement through without submitting it to the Colombian Congress for approval. You see, the Colombian constitution requires congressional approval for international treaties and the submission of such agreements to review by the Constitutional Court, but not for extensions of previous treaties.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
This is somewhat conflicting with what Hillary said
www.nytimes.com...
What do you think?
Barack Obama continues to defend the expansion of U.S. military operations in Latin America, arguing that the U.S. is not establishing bases in Colombia but simply extending existing agreements with the country.
Under U.S. military terminology -- using euphemisms that call to mind George W. Bush's "Clear Skies Initiative" -- the proposals for Colombia would not be bases because they would not be property of the U.S, but instead be called Forward Operating Locations, or Cooperative Security Locations.
Nonetheless, the U.S. would still have control over what happens in those installations, as it does in bases, and is insisting on immunity under Colombian law for its personnel. Argentine President Cristina Kirchner said it well when she joked to Colombia's President Alvaro Uribe last week, "Come on, nowhere in the world is a Gen. Fernandez going to give orders to a Gen. Johnson!"
Originally posted by kozmo
At what point will Americans wake up and demand a return to Constitutional government?
Originally posted by kozmo
At what point will Americans wake up and demand a return to Constitutional government?
At what point should we take to arms to make this happen?
Originally posted by Roadblockx
For those that voted for this backwards-@ss, socialist, Chicago-style political wanna-by thug who went to church to listen to anti-American sermons, I hope you all choke on his "change".
Originally posted by Asktheanimals
I smell a war
folks, you know we've just GOT to have some oil sources closer to
home...
America is on it's last legs people, thrashing around like a wounded
animal in it's death throes.
Originally posted by Roadblockx
Having two sons that are still under 10, I seriously hope that A) there is a God and B) he figures out a way to turn this county around before we are forced to learn Chinese, Russian or some other pig latin BS language.
I fear very much that like all other great empires that p#ssed away their blessings and good fortunes, the US could be on the same track.