It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by twitchy
I'm posting totally from memory here, but Drex I think was CDI's technology that involved cutter charges that were capable of customizing the cutting of the steel beams during a demolition to fit the specific equipment of the clean up crew. There's a thread or a post on here somewhere by me I think that discusses the amazing phenomenon of neatly cut steel beams in the WTC rubble as well but it's late.
Semtex was invented in the late 1950s by Stanislav Brebera, a chemist at VCHZ Synthesia.
...Semtex was similar to other plastic explosives, especially C-4, in that it was easily malleable; but it was usable over a greater temperature range than other plastic explosives. There are also visual differences: whereas C-4 is off-white in colour, Semtex is brick-orange.
The new explosive was widely exported, notably to the government of North Vietnam, which received 14 tonnes during the Vietnam War. However, the main consumer was Libya; about 700 tonnes of Semtex were exported to Libya between 1975 and 1981 by Omnipol. It has also been used by Islamic militants in the Middle East and by republican paramilitaries such as the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) and Irish National Liberation Army in Northern Ireland.
Also in response to international agreements, Semtex has a detection taggant added to produce a distinctive vapor signature to aid detection. First, ethylene glycole dinitrate was used, later switched to 2,3-dinitro-2,3-dimethylbutane (3,4-dinitrohexane, DMDNB), which is used currently. According to the manufacturer, the taggant agent was voluntarily being added since 1991, years before the protocol signed became compulsory.
Batches of Semtex made before 1990, however, are untagged, though it is not known whether there are still major stocks of such old batches of Semtex. The shelf life of Semtex was reduced from 10 years guarantee prior to 1990s to 5 years now.
On May 25, 1997 Bohumil Šole, a scientist often said to have been involved with inventing Semtex, strapped the explosive to his body and committed suicide in the Priessnitz spa of Jeseník. Sole, 63, was being treated there for depression. Twenty other people were hurt in the explosion, while six were seriously injured. It should be noted, however, that the manufacturer, Explosia, states that he was not a member of the team that developed the explosive.
Large buildings, tall chimneys, smokestacks, and increasingly some smaller structures may be destroyed by building implosion using explosives. Imploding a building is very fast — the collapse itself only takes seconds — and an expert can ensure that the building falls into its own footprint, so as not to damage neighboring structures. This is essential for tall structures in dense urban areas.
Any error can be disastrous, however, and some demolitions have failed, severely damaging neighboring structures. The greatest danger is from flying debris which, when improperly prepared for, can kill onlookers.
Even more dangerous is the partial failure of an attempted implosion.
... and filled with un-detonated but still primed explosives, making it difficult for workers to approach safely.
Preparation
It takes several weeks or months to prepare a building for implosion. All items of value, such as copper wiring, are stripped from a building. Some materials must be removed, such as glass that can form deadly projectiles, and insulation that can scatter over a wide area. Non-load bearing partitions and drywall are removed. Selected columns on floors where explosives will be set are drilled and nitroglycerin and TNT are placed in the holes. Smaller columns and walls are wrapped in detonating cord. The goal is to use as little explosive as possible; only a few floors are rigged with explosives, so that it is safer (fewer explosives) and less costly. The areas with explosives are covered in thick geotextile fabric and fencing to absorb flying debris.
...only a few floors are rigged with explosives...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Thing is, the "Truthers" have all of these grand claims of explosions everywhere, all around, DURING the collapse, in the basement, the lobby, you name it...when, in fact, it isn't necessary.
SO...a few key points, with explosives, cause damage, let gravity do the rest. NO ONE ever saw, nor has come forth as accomplishing, these explosives plantings. BUT, per the article, it IS possible to bring down a structure by damaging key sections....JUST LIKE a large, heavy passenger jet may do, hmmmm??????
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Well, it certainly blows stuff up, especially if strapped directly to your body. BUT, others survived? He was IN a spa, so sounds like it was indoors...yet, the building didn't collapse and kill others?
Originally posted by IBeenThereDoneThat
Considering the way the government-influenced media covers topics like disclosure, UFO's, JFK, etc. (i.e. you can hear the broadcaster chuckle when reading one of those types of reports) why is anyone surprised that the topic of 9/11 conspiracy would be treated any differently?
And considering the fact that the producer of the "inside 9/11" National Geographic is himself a former member of skull and bones (same as W. and his dad/grandad before him), I have to agree with what others stated: this is just a snow job to further support the official government explanation.
National Geographic Propaganda
So, to all of the sheeple who are in this thread trying to debunk evidence, hop back in your lifted pickup trucks and go have a beer with your buddies. You will never keep the truth from being exposed.
“After Lockerbie, journalists started being interested in the product,” says Pulicar, Explosia’s Sales Manager. “It got a bad name. Business started dropping off.”
Furthermore, Pulicar says that it’s not even possible to reduce the compound’s lifespan. Recent tests of munitions from World War II which are similar to Semtex – but chemically less sophisticated – found them to be live. Sixty-year-old shells: still effective. While Semtex’s malleability can be modified, its potency cannot.
“Think of a car tire,” Pulicar says. “Put it in a field for twenty years. What do you think happens to it?” Maybe it’s a bit brittle, maybe a bit weather-worn, but it’s still a tire. And stored correctly, not in a field exposed to the elements, it will still hold air two decades down the line. A car tire is made from rubber, polymers, curatives, anti-degradents and carbon black. Semtex is made from variations of those same things, only with explosive instead of carbon.
When asked how many years he thought Semtex would remain effective, Pulicar replied, “Sixty, 70, 80...150, maybe 200 years, maybe more. No one knows.”
Ivo Varga, Explosia’s senior technologist, agrees.
the FBI agrees that semtex has an indefinite shelf life.
Originally posted by billybob
the FBI agrees that semtex has an indefinite shelf life.
www.911myths.com/WTC_CD.pdf
First, explosives are very, very dangerous.[...] Many of them can be set off by small movements and low weights and temperatures that you can reach in your household oven.
Second, CD is designed for good conditions. The tools simply don’t exist to detonate a building upwards of 1000 degrees on fire being hit by tons of concrete. Very few explosives would survive seconds of being in that building, let alone seven hours, and even if they
did the detonators are not made to.
What you’d see if the explosives could survive the initial shock and fires isn’t the neat CD the CTers claim, but an extremely unpredictable blast pattern or no detonation at all.
Originally posted by billybob
reply to post by mmiichael
you have been shown a PERFECTLY PLAUSIBLE explanation to the demolition.
i'm not saying that's what happened, just that it is ONE workable scenario.
you see, for some of us, the moment we saw the towers fall, our science minds kicked in and said to us, "DUDE! those towers were demolished! the law of conservation of momentum says a building can't break itself apart that fast."
and, ever since, we have been in pursuit of not IF the towers were blown, but WHY? and HOW?
the WHY is more important than the HOW.
the HOW is important to know so we can find out the WHO.