It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by danny-arclight
reply to post by FireMoon
and what if they simply dont want to show their rocket failures to their enemies? This is nothing to do with UFO's this is simply propaganda. You dont show the enemy your own side losing! Your'e mixing alien conspiracy paranioia with cold war paranoia - both exist, but one was becuase there was a war going on and one was because its easier for some people to interpret this as a conspiracy involving an extra-terrestrial race. The conspiracy was real! the conspiracy was a plan to hide failure from the patriotic US/UK govts - the terrible thought one of their own missiles / rockets failed.... Like taking prozac and then having to admit you're impotent... thats what they didnt want you to see... not little green men running round waving their arms telling us not to drop bombs on each other.
KNOW YOUR HISTORY. IT WILL BE FAR KINDER TO YOU.
Besides, where is this proof or artic;e of the launch being infiltrated? Do you have a link?
edit: jsu trealised the thing had an awful flight record: looks like the good old brits sold the thing as a job lot to anyone who would take it: en.wikipedia.org...
[
[edit on 17-8-2009 by danny-arclight]
Originally posted by moocowman
Dude, although I fully understand what the phrase implies, that is the first time I've ever heard it being used so get off your high horse with the other poster, please.
Originally posted by yeti101
Nick pope hasnt even read the reports done by ufologists at the time.
Originally posted by yeti101
Why would someone who is going out to look for ufos take a dictaphone and not a camera?
Originally posted by danny-arclight
Just as the original eyewitnesses to this event couldnt at first correcty recalled the exact date it happened (FACT).
Originally posted by danny-arclight
- The imprints on the grounds and marks on the trees were similar insize and style to rutting deer.
Originally posted by danny-arclight
Originally posted by Rigel Kent
OK, See: www.ianridpath.com... - I just want to take a look at some of your comments you make below.
We have a lot of strange sayings in England.
If someone referred to an item as a "banana skin" I would immediately think that they were warning me that it was potentially dangerous or as stated cause for a "slip-up" and therefore potentially harmful. Other similar terms in common use might be "hot potato" or "poisoned chalice" You heard of them?
- Banana Skins also refers to falling ove ron your arse in public and making a fool of yourself.
In the case of Rendlesham Forrest,
I remember searching the internet and reading released government documents at the beginning of this year and nowhere did I find reference that some US Service men had come forward and admitted that they were shining torches and it was all a hoax. Smacks of govt dis-info through the BBC to me.
- Why would the BBC be interested in dis-informing its viewers and readers? The Beeb has some of the most liberal, forward thinking journalists in the world, producing intelligent, informed articles, news and debate.
- While its true also tha this security guard later retracted his 'hoax' confession. This just goes to show that you cannot trust all 'witnesses' or 'participants' in a story. Just as the original eyewitnesses to this event couldnt at first correcty recalled the exact date it happened (FACT).
I remember reading and listening to the US military radio traffic transcript from the base security personnel and it was very detailed stuff.
If memory serves me correctly, the incident happened over 2 consecutive nights and several staff from the USAF base got very close to the disc which had landed in the forrest on the second night.
- they didnt see a disc, they saw only lights and heard sounds. the lights were blue, red and yellow, l(like a police car vehicle lights).
The next morning they even measured and charted the imprints in the forrest floor from the crafts 3 feet/landing gear and also documented freshly damaged tree bark at the site.
- The imprints on the grounds and marks on the trees were similar insize and style to rutting deer.
I thik they also got increased background radiation levels at the landing site and they had all sorts of problems with radios and flashlights not working correctly around the site.
- The radiation levels were no higher than typical background activity - with some momentary peaks on the equipment that were not repeated and were similar to using and moving with the equipment.
The incident was also witnessed by member(s) of the local Police and the farmer reported that all of the animals were going crazy in the middle of the night.
- The farmer did not keep animals, nor was he a witness.
The craft was also plotted by ground radar staff and at phenomenal speeds after taking off.
- Where is your basis for this statement?
Unfortunately I can not post documents as they were all on my other laptop which got stolen a few weeks back so I am recalling this from memory, but I think it is near enough to what I read online from these doc's
- sorry to hear about the lap top, not wishing to poke fun, Is this another case of Psi-Ops?
If you spend a few hours searching the www you guys should be able to verify everything that I have said here.
Yeah - there are plenty of people who have - perhaps it would be better however if the argument was better balanced, rather than constantly reduced to this 'news' 'government' 'bbc' conspiracy.... This conspiracy stuff just makes the debate dull. Might as well accept that if there is a cover-up, we can only go on the basis of what we can see, read and hear in the media, press and internet. The very places of conspiracy, apparently.
Peace to you too.
Originally posted by ClickfootWell given that I lived there for over 30 years and never heard of it, I'd say "no it isn't".