Who was responsible for the following peoples death

RFK
MLK
Gandhi
John Lennon


All of these people get assassinated, all of them are peace activists.

doesn't make seance why they would just die.

John Wilks Booth.

2nd

RFK was killed because the Military/Industrial complex wanted to stop him from ending the Vietnam war and costing them billions.


MLK was murdered by the FBI because they feared the rise of a "black messiah".


John Lennon was murdered by Regan's backers they knew how reactionary his administration was going to be and not wanting to put up with all those chaotic protests from the 60's and early 70's.



Gandhi I always felt his murder was revenge by the British.

reply to post by dino1989

doesn't make seance why they would just die

It makes perfect cents why they would be killed off...or a sound reason for 3 0f the 4.


A blatant message to those that would dare to engage TPTB...don't or you die.


And considering the state of the world, it's had an impact - and not a good one...

John Lennon was killed by CIA in my opinion.

More info here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

They were all betrayed and murdered by their wives. You guys should learn a little about how the world works; it will save your life.

In the case of Gandhi, his lover.

[edit on 15-8-2009 by IDK88]

Not you LiveForever8

This is why i get annoyed a lot of you here thing everything is a conspiracy

no one really have facts to prove there point

if Mr King was killed by the FBI , there would a LOT of conspiracy theories going around , but they aren't any


i hope no one believes in chemtrails any more



[edit on 15-8-2009 by dino1989]

Originally posted by dino1989
Not you LiveForever8

This is why i get annoyed a lot of you here thing everything is a conspiracy

no one really have facts to prove there point

if Mr King was killed by the FBI , there would a LOT of conspiracy theories going around , but they aren't any


i hope no one believes in chemtrails any more

[edit on 15-8-2009 by dino1989]

I don't understand what you are saying?

If i had facts it wouldn't be a conspiracy theory, it would be an accepted factual theory (in theory), understand?

I would just like to chime in long enough to say that indeed these are just theories, and though the exact things elude my memory, there is some credible evidence supporting them.

But I want everyone to remember that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence, so we must keep a scrutinizing but open mind or rish being another stupid puppet who wouldn't believe a chemtrail if it farted on them. (FYI though i haven't seen any in my city)

reply to post by LiveForever8

Originally posted by LiveForever8
John Lennon was killed by CIA in my opinion.
More info here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

- ... -


[edit on 16-8-2009 by WonderfulWorld]

Originally posted by WonderfulWorld
reply to post by LiveForever8

 

Originally posted by LiveForever8
John Lennon was killed by CIA in my opinion.
More info here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Uuii, Mr. big helper of humanity, so concerned about poor guys being threatened/murdered? Then why were you backing the same perpetrators: www.abovetopsecret.com...???

I see, you don't want "them" to know "too" much. Just as much as it suits your personal purposes, right? Sometimes there's a fine line between good and evil.


[edit on 16-8-2009 by WonderfulWorld]

"why were you backing the same perpetrators?"
"suits your personal purposes"

I would like you to explain these comments further

[edit on 05/08/09 by LiveForever8]

All killed by CIA. I donno about ghandi, I admit I havent really read much about him.

And obviously this is just my opinion.

[edit on by jeasahtheseer]

reply to post by LiveForever8

Firstly, my above post was just accidentally deleted. It was:

Originally posted by LiveForever8
John Lennon was killed by CIA in my opinion.
More info here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by WonderfulWorld
Uuii, Mr. big helper of humanity, so concerned about poor guys being threatened/murdered? Then why were you backing the same perpetrators: www.abovetopsecret.com...???
I see, you don't want "them" to know "too" much. Just as much as it suits your personal purposes, right? Sometimes there's a fine line between good and evil.

Now about your last post/answer:

Originally posted by LiveForever8
John Lennon was killed by CIA in my opinion.
More info here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

Originally posted by WonderfulWorld
Uuii, Mr. big helper of humanity, so concerned about poor guys being threatened/murdered? Then why were you backing the same perpetrators: www.abovetopsecret.com...???
I see, you don't want "them" to know "too" much. Just as much as it suits your personal purposes, right? Sometimes there's a fine line between good and evil.

Originally posted by LiveForever8
"why were you backing the same perpetrators?"
"suits your personal purposes"
I would like you to explain these comments further

Why explain something which is pretty self-explanatory? Just read what I wrote, read what you wrote, and connect the dots.


[edit on 21-8-2009 by WonderfulWorld]

reply to post by WonderfulWorld


What has what i said in the John Lear thread got to do with anything?

Explain what you meant.

[edit on 05/08/09 by LiveForever8]

reply to post by LiveForever8

Originally posted by LiveForever8
What has what i said in the John Lear thread got to do with anything?
Explain what you meant.

That’s easy. It was CLEARLY a false assertion of yours to state ALL Lear said is "fantasy" ("i dont for a second believe any of it. Pure fantasy."). Probably 10-20% of what he said may be wrong. But about 80-90% is correct, for instance of what he revealed regarding 9/11, the moon, alien races, the infamous treaty. Of course we know these issues are - big surprise - subject to heavy disinformation. Now, I can discern certain disinformation from truth. And what you posted here www.abovetopsecret.com... was certainly not the truth (It's not always the truth that gets the most points.)

Now, what's fishy is how you - admittedly - strive to really tell/support the truth in most of your threads/posts (as e.g. in this thread regarding John Lennon), then suddenly change side and start covering a blatantly wrong accusation, obviously spread by certain "vested interests". Just an accidental error/misunderstanding, or a knowing assistance with the sublime strategy of concealing "only" the key facts from the sheepies?


[edit on 21-8-2009 by WonderfulWorld]

Originally posted by WonderfulWorld
reply to post by LiveForever8

 

Originally posted by LiveForever8
What has what i said in the John Lear thread got to do with anything?
Explain what you meant.

That’s easy. It was CLEARLY a false assertion of yours to state ALL Lear said is "fantasy" ("i dont for a second believe any of it. Pure fantasy."). Probably 10-20% of what he said may be wrong. But about 80-90% is correct, for instance of what he revealed regarding 9/11, the moon, alien races, the infamous treaty. Of course we know these issues are - big surprise - subject to heavy disinformation. Now, I can discern certain disinformation from truth. And what you posted here www.abovetopsecret.com... was certainly not the truth (It's not always the truth that gets the most points.)

Now, what's fishy is how you - admittedly - strive to really tell/support the truth in most of your threads/posts (as e.g. in this thread regarding John Lennon), then suddenly change side and start covering a blatantly wrong accusation, obviously spread by certain "vested interests". Just an accidental error/misunderstanding, or a knowing assistance with the sublime strategy of concealing "only" the key facts from the sheepies?


[edit on 21-8-2009 by WonderfulWorld]

Ever heard of a storm in a teacup?

Here's what happened:
I never said i disbelieve ALL Lear has said or that ALL he has said is pure fantasy. What i meant to say is that from what i personally have seen/heard of Lear, i disbelieve.
My only mistake was that i didn't state that clearly enough.

My problem with Lear is that he states things as fact, without little to no proof. Please give me some examples of his evidence/theories and i will seriously look into them. I do have an open mind.

What you have said in the second paragraph is very insulting. You are making very serious accusations/assumptions.

Saying that i believe the CIA could have been involved in John Lennon's death and giving my personal opinion on John Lear have nothing to do with each other.

Like i said...storm in a teacup