It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
link
The conservative playbook has been laid bare, and it's ugly. How long until their overheated rhetoric spills over into violence?
~Rush link
"Global warming is no different than health care, is no different than cap and trade," Rush Limbaugh explained on Monday. "It is simply another branch of liberalism, statism, that is designed to expand government control over individuals and their liberty and their freedom and their income."
"And if this plays out right ... you can do some great damage, culturally, to liberalism," he concluded.
~Beck
On Monday, Glenn Beck made clear that he does not support violence in the name of political causes. Sure, he's advocating civil disobedience if need be. Maybe 70 million people voted for Barack Obama less than a year ago, but who cares? "It is time to go to Washington!" he preached on Wednesday. "It is time to stand or sit in the middle of the street if you have to!" But remember: no violence.
Then on Thursday, he poisoned the speaker of the House. Not literally, of course -- just in effigy. On live television. What's the problem? Can't you liberals take a joke?
link
It was a perfect example of the game conservatives in the media are playing: pouring gasoline on the fire, and then, once they are criticized, saying that they were only kidding.
How many times can Beck portray Obama as a traitor who is destroying our national sovereignty, or compare the president's health care proposals to those of the Nazis, before the anger spills over? He calls for calm, and then describes the Obama-led "brownshirts" who are silencing dissent and the "enemies list" the White House is compiling of those who dare to voice their opinions.
"It is simply another branch of liberalism, statism, that is designed to expand government control over individuals and their liberty and their freedom and their income."
Originally posted by HotDogNoBun
reply to post by Animal
Right and Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, and that stupid Ed guy are all saints and only hand us the truth instead of backing an agenda that will make their parent company GE a ton of money. Look it goes both ways. Anyone can see that.
You know the smartest thing I read lately was SkepticOverlord saying that he had a bias. A bias against people getting all torn to the left or torn to the right and he is right to feel that way. Sometimes it is fun to go back and forth and argue, but is it really constructive.. probably not.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
"It is simply another branch of liberalism, statism, that is designed to expand government control over individuals and their liberty and their freedom and their income."
He's exactly right. Find me a liberal who doesn't believe in human-caused Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever they are calling it now. Find me a liberal who is not in favor of the 1000+ page health care bill their politicians haven't read.
Originally posted by jjkenobi
He's exactly right. Find me a liberal who doesn't believe in human-caused Global Warming/Climate Change/whatever they are calling it now. Find me a liberal who is not in favor of the 1000+ page health care bill their politicians haven't read.
Liberalism is a broad class of political philosophies that considers individual liberty and equality to be the most important political goals.
Statism (or etatism) is a term that may refer to either one or both of the following:
* A major government or state role in the direction of the economy, both directly through state-owned enterprises and indirectly through the state-directed economic planning of the overall economy.
* A political viewpoint "that sovereignty is vested not in the people but in the national state, and that all individuals and associations exist only to enhance the power, the prestige, and the well-being of the state. The fascist concept of statism repudiates individualism and exalts the nation as an organic body headed by the Supreme Leader and nurtured by unity, force, and discipline."
For sure. However in the present situation we do not see those you listed as insighting what could very easily become violence thus they are not part of this thread. Biased they are, insighting discord and hate they are (in my knowledge) not.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
Painting people as racist, angry mobs, and labeling them derogatory names isn't inspiring hate?
Give me a break.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
reply to post by Animal
For sure. However in the present situation we do not see those you listed as insighting what could very easily become violence thus they are not part of this thread. Biased they are, insighting discord and hate they are (in my knowledge) not.
Painting people as racist, angry mobs, and labeling them derogatory names isn't inspiring hate?
Give me a break.
Originally posted by Animal
not reserved to the realm of acceptable decent.
It is important to remember that no matter how much we disagree we are still in this together and owe one another basic respect.
The motivation to aggressively and violently attack the opposition will only do damage to the entire country, right and left alike.
i fear for the well being of the nation.
[edit on 11-8-2009 by Animal]
Originally posted by hotrodturbo7
It has already come to violence.
The SEIU (Obama's union buddies) are beating people up at town halls.
Originally posted by redoubt
In sum, NO. There are no good guys, there are no bad guys. There's just you and me... Americans, and we just sometimes disagree.