It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
On July 30, BlackLight Power announced a commercial license agreement with Maryland-based Akridge Energy. BLP will allow Akridge to use their energy producing process for generating electricity in Maryland, Virginia and the District of Colombia, up to a maximum continuous capacity of 400 MW.
“We believe BlackLight Power has developed a new energy technology that will have a profound impact on the environment and the economy and will help us achieve our goal in becoming a major, green-power producer in the greater-DC market,” said John E. Akridge III, chairman and owner of Akridge Energy. “We are excited to be one of the early-adopters of BLP’s energy technology.” Mr. Akridge is also a shareholder of BlackLight Power.
The trust that Akridge Energy is giving BlackLight by investing in them should give the science community a reason to think more about hydrinos and accept newer physics concepts that, even if not fully understood and demonstrated, work.
Originally posted by Hastobemoretolife
Okay cool, I had to do a fast google search to find out what exactly they developed again, and now I have been reminded.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
I'll have more to add later on this. Great find.
S & F.
Interesting company logo.
[edit on 10-8-2009 by SLAYER69]
Originally posted by moonwilson
It's interesting, but I wonder why the independent verification was conducted by Rowan University- which is a relatively obscure school. A larger tech school would be much more credible and confidence inspiring. Why not MIT, or another large, state tech/ engineering school? Is it because they wanted to avoid schools with military/ government funding?
I would think this important a development would be of extreme interest to the greater science and engineering community.
[edit on 11-8-2009 by moonwilson]
Originally posted by MajorDisaster
reply to post by wisdomnotemotion
Agreed, the title of the article is a bit misleading. It's more like "really really really cheap energy" than "free energy".