It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jinx880101
This signifies the coming of that Maitreya, instead of Jesus....
Originally posted by jinx880101
reply to post by muzzleflash
Visit the main site and have a look at the rest of the pics of these 'stars'.
www.share-international.org...
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by jinx880101
This signifies the coming of that Maitreya, instead of Jesus....
I guess their religion wins, haha just joking.
They are the same thing. Messiah = Messiah
Every religion has one, no need to claim it all for one group.
Share the Messiah people cmon.
Originally posted by jinx880101
reply to post by muzzleflash
Visit the main site and have a look at the rest of the pics of these 'stars'.
www.share-international.org...
After we all see the ‘star’ won’t Maitreya be the main speaker or is the star going to run its show for another year before the appearance of Maitreya? I have been an amateur astronomer for 25 years. Stars are suns, they don’t move in orbital cycles. Would you care to enlighten me on a star that moves? Maybe it’s another object that has a projected orbit?
There are four “star-like luminaries” which are now seen by many people around the world. They are huge spacecraft from different planets of our solar system. Their presence among us is further proof of the reality of UFOs and intelligent and harmless life in our own solar system.
Originally posted by jinx880101
reply to post by Sam60
One diamond shape, another a hexagon? Are these both camera effects?
Originally posted by jinx880101
reply to post by Sam60
Ok, thanks that would be great. So what do you think these accually are, just normal regular stars overexposed?
Originally posted by Sam60
Originally posted by jinx880101
reply to post by Sam60
Ok, thanks that would be great. So what do you think these accually are, just normal regular stars overexposed?
The objects could be anything - there are no points of reference.
The objects could well be stars, but the objects could also be just any point light source.
I'll spend a few minutes a grab some links for you so you are not taking my word for all of this.