It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by grover
Its all about demonizing Democrats...
AND yes its about race and (implied) religion.
IF Obama was an Irish Catholic and Republican and there was some question as to where he was born they would be screaming bloody murder if anyone on the left dared question it.
Originally posted by Hazelnut
Slinging insults is hardly the way to prove your point or get your thoughts across Grover. What is a "blither loons"?
..............................................................................
[mod edit: removed unnecessary quote of entire previous post]
Quoting - Please review this link
[edit on 28-7-2009 by 12m8keall2c]
Originally posted by AshleyD
McCain, a white, Christian, republican also had to validate his place of birth. I don't like him either.
Please, I beg all of you, quite resorting to the race and partisan card.
Originally posted by AshleyD
Originally posted by grover
Its all about demonizing Democrats...
AND yes its about race and (implied) religion.
IF Obama was an Irish Catholic and Republican and there was some question as to where he was born they would be screaming bloody murder if anyone on the left dared question it.
Sigh.
I'm a white, Christian, and [disenchanted] Republican but I don't recall making even one post on ATS that is supportive of Bush- just the opposite.
There are many white, Christian, and republican members and citizens who feel the same way.
We can speak against Bush and engage in Bush/Cheney conspiracies to our hearts content but when we are suspicious of Obama as well, suddenly it's just due to race and the fact he's a democrat.
McCain, a white, Christian, republican also had to validate his place of birth. I don't like him either.
Please, I beg all of you, quite resorting to the race and partisan card.
Also, there is plenty of evidence that supports Obama's legitimacy yet it is out right dismissed by those who oppose him where as with Bush Co there was a tremendous amount of proof that he was acting nefariously.
Originally posted by Animal
There is a big difference between this type of criticizing Obama and the criticisms of Bush CO. Comparing them makes little sense.
This is a propaganda attack on Obama's legitimacy and citizenship and has nothing to do with policy.
That is because their so-called movement isn't about Obama's birth certificate...never was...never will be. Its all about sucking on sour grapes... Its all about delegitimising his presidency... Its all about demonizing Democrats...
Originally posted by SpacePunk
Although there are no definitions of what a 'natural born citizen' is, it would go to say that the person would need to be born a citizen of the United States. Now, the definition depends on how many sour grapes the birther is chewing on.
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
They're irrational because there's overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural born citizen.
I I have yet to see this overwhelming proof. Care to show it to us?
Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh
reply to post by Animal
Yes, it is about race because there are no white immigrants
Also, there is plenty of evidence that supports Obama's legitimacy yet it is out right dismissed by those who oppose him where as with Bush Co there was a tremendous amount of proof that he was acting nefariously.
What evidence? Please show it to me, and answer my questions earlier in this thread as well.
Thanks!
I will be waiting.
Originally posted by Hazelnut
reply to post by grover
I'm not a leftie or rightie. I'm not an independent or liberal. I'm not anything politically speaking. Personally, I just wonder why the issue continues when it would be so simple to end it once and for all. Nobody wants to think that they've been deceived. Perhaps a "movement" has been created to further an alternate agenda, I don't really know, or care.
I just wonder why and who started this devisive, evasive tactic and for what purpose. To my way of thinking (not expecting anyone to follow or understand), why not just dig out that "original"? Why all the controversy? It is ridiculous to continue ignoring the fact that people have serious doubts, whether founded or unjust. What especially surprises me is the venom traded back and forth by lefties and righties. Just doesn't seem right.
Originally posted by Hazelnut
Originally posted by whatukno
It doesn't matter. Birthers won't believe anything anyone says or shows. It's pathological at this point.
It's a pathological hatred for Obama nothing more. It's useless to try and argue with this crowd. Nothing will get through to them. Just let them flail away madly and let them be.
Wrong. Not hatred.
Confusion. Illogical. Deflection. Evasive. Non-responsive.