posted on Jul, 27 2009 @ 03:46 PM
This idea struck me a week ago and has been something that I can't help but consider.
There are some things about this pandemic that make me wonder about the other theories around its creation. Firstly, if the idea of it is
depopulisation, why is the virus so harmless to most? Surely, it would have made more sense to make it more lethal, perhaps by combining it with the
avian flu virus with a kill rate of 60%+ (especially when we have been warned for years of it mutating and spreading from person to person.) In
addition, if people were dropping dead left, right and centre, there would be an understandable urgency for a vaccine, and the public would be more
willing to accept the risk of it being rushed through, when the alternative would be to risk surviving the flu. By introducing a pretty weak
pandemic, TPTB have opened themselves up to speculation about the urgency of this vaccine and its need, to perhaps, be mandatory. On top of that,
they wouldn't necessarily need the vaccine to trigger off this depopulisation. I have no doubt that they have the technology to be able to
create an extremley lethal and highly contagious virus. So why go a very haphazard way around depopulating?
So, the other idea that the virus and vaccine is to line pockets, has holes in it also (as I'm sure my theory does too!). Whilst I am sure that
there are politicians, those in WHO, UN etc. who have their hand in the pharmaceutical money pot, a great number of them won't. Why would WHO
declare a pandemic over a virus that has been referred to by Doctors as "the weakest pandemic the world has ever seen."? (Please to QA's thread for
the link to this statement!) And why would our Governments, as some consider, 'overreact' by throwing (collectively) trillions at a vaccine when
the world is already in a state of a critical recession? When they could instead advice people on normal, free measures on how to maintain a
healthy lifestyle to stand you in good stead should you catch the flu.
Now, I know that our governments have been swindling billions away on secret ventures for years but what if they are aware of something in the future,
that requires the need for them to secure trillions more? I don't know how it is in the rest of the world but in the UK, prior to the flu, the
Governments spending was headline news, every day. Now, more than ever, people are analysing where the tax payers money is going, due to the
recession that we are currently experiencing. Where as once upon a time, the government may have been able to pool more resources, if billions of
more pounds were to go 'missing' currently, sooner or later, someone would pick up on it and question where it is going.
By creating the virus, they knew that if it were more lethal and more people required hospital care, that would be a huge drain on the health system.
So instead, they have created a fairly mild, yet highly contagious virus that has spread across the world, 'justifying' the WHO's statement that
it has reached a pandemic situation. By fearmongering and making it sound worse than it is, it has provided the governments of the world, opportunity
to 'spend' trillions on vaccines, right before the publics eyes, justifying this huge expenditure during an economic crisis. Noones going to
question this huge amount of money being spent when faced with an apparent flu pandemic.
This vaccine could, as others have suggested, just be a placebo. If people still catch swine flu afterwards and die- well then, the vaccine didn't
work because they haven't had the time to successfully create one. Even then, the government could continue to pour more and more money into
creating one, with no questions asked.
To be honest, if this is the case, I have no idea what they would need this kind of money for. I can only speculate on there being some global
disaster in the near future, which our governments are preparing for and can't admit to due to the fear and panic that would arrise from that
admission. I just can't help feeling like we are having the wool pulled over our eyes with this flu.
[edit on 27-7-2009 by JennyJen]