Gage, Asner, Hicks, Griffin, etc. endorse Pentagon Investigation

Originally posted by Craig Ranke CIT
Although this one won't come as a surprise to anyone it's the substance of the claim and importance of the message that everyone should ponder:

"A conventional fixed wing aircraft, 757 or otherwise, cannot maneuver from north of the former Citgo gas station to cause the physical damage to the light poles, generator trailer, or the Pentagon without structural failure of the airframe itself. The maneuver would require G forces exceeding aircraft capabilities and that of the human body. Physics and math do not lie. If you accept the placement of the plane as independently and unanimously reported by the witnesses presented in CIT's video National Security Alert, science proves that it did not cause the physical damage at the Pentagon on 9/11/2001."


Robert Balsamo, FAA Certified Pilot
Founder of Pilots for 9/11 Truth

Pondering this substance and acceding to Balsamo's 757 expertise leads to the conclusion that the flight path was obviously not north of the Citgo station and the aircraft didn't maneuver before it hit the light poles, generator, and Pentagon.