It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What you have to realize is that the key underlying theory here is this 'exposure'. Where, worms in holes bend the G Well to the point distance is irrelevant.
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
If No LIGHT was to be reflected from a Black object, we would Not be able to see it but rather a Hole in the same shape and size would appear instead???
yet have only presented simple logical experiments, and act like you cannot talk because you are not allowed to
I also believe that we are both receivers and transmitters, although our field of consciousness (or unconsciousness) exists outside your body
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by above
Thank you for the Post and Links.
The reason why we interpret LIGHT as being both in the nature of Particle and Wave theory is Not surprising as All in our Experience (i.e. This little Universe) is of a dual nature because of its base Processing.
Much seems to also be based on a Paradox nature… Perhaps this is what leads to having the power of choice ???
We assume that the 3D experience is produced in the same manner as what we observe after the information has been “Decoded” involving an elaborate System through the Brain.
But this does Not dictate that the Cause of this experience is also of a 3D Source.
It could very well be generated from a Non Dimensional Source via Instruction sets based on Conceptual principals involving Geometry.
Do you realise that what Consciousness actually is, and where its Origin is within the Brain, is only assumed based on theory.
Much is being done to date and some very, very strange phenomena is being discovered.
Recently I saw and English program on TV regarding this..
A Subject was given a simple task of making choices based on Yes & No, through a couple of button switches, while is brain was being scanned.
The Very odd thing that was discovered was that the technician observing the Scan (in real Time) noticed he could see the decision made via the Scan, about 6 seconds before the subject themselves Consciously made their decision ???
This was done by comparing the action of enabling one of the button switches against the Scan which was also recorded.
The Odd thing was, there was Activity in the Brain 6 Seconds before the Choice was made by the subject to activate the Switch, not the accepted >< 0.6 of a second for the so called physical reaction time ???
Originally posted by TeslaandLyne
Any one familiar with light reflection and refraction.
I recall there is a dependence solely on the electric field.
EM radiation is really an oscillating field of both E and M components.
Originally posted by The Matrix Traveller
reply to post by mr-lizard
Visual Communication (of the Mind) comes down to 3 things...
a. Shape. (includes Size)
b. Position.
c. Colour.
Lightning discharges are considered as the primary natural source of Schumann resonances. Lightning channels behave like a huge antenna which radiates electromagnetic energy as impulsive signals at frequencies below about 100 kHz [15]. These signals are very weak, but the earth-ionosphere waveguide behaves like a resonator at ELF frequencies and amplifies the spectral signals from lightning at the resonance frequencies [15].
In an ideal cavity, the resonant frequency of the n-th mode fn is determined by the Earth radius a and the speed of light c [6].
f_[n] =\frac[c][2 \pi a]\sqrt[n(n+1)]
In physics, resonance is the tendency of a system to oscillate at maximum amplitude at a certain frequency. This frequency is known as the system's resonance frequency (or resonant frequency). When damping is small, the resonance frequency is approximately equal to the natural frequency of the system, which is the frequency of free vibrations.
Acoustic resonance is the tendency of an acoustic system to absorb more energy when the frequency of its oscillations matches the system's natural frequency of vibration (its resonance frequency) than it does at other frequencies.