It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IDK88
They'd be jockeying for Korean reconstruction and energy exploration contracts. When it comes down to it they're all just a bunch of greedy whores.
Originally posted by Spartak_FL
.And lets not forget seoul which is home to millions of people...
Really? Last time i checked Seoul is 60km from the DMZ and unreachable from just about all North Korean Artillery except Surface to Surface missiles which can easily be dealt with using the PAC 3.
Gotta love how N. Korea keeps throwing that around. In reality, Seoul would be just fine and any attempt by N Korea to shell it would fall very short.
Yes there are suburbs of Goyang. But still. facts are facts.
[edit on 26-7-2009 by Spartak_FL]
According to one report, a South Korean security analyst suggested that DPRK artillery pieces of calibers 170mm and 240mm "could fire 10,000 rounds per minute to Seoul and its environs." North Korea has about 500 long-range artillery tubes within range of Seoul, and the total rate of fire of thjese artillery pieces would be between 2,000 and 4,000 rounds per minute. The DPRK's two hundred 240mm MRLs fire either 12 or 22 rounds, providing a maximum single salvo of no more than 4,400 rounds.
Originally posted by Spartak_FL
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
reply to post by Spartak_FL
Actually, Soul is about 35 miles from the border.
San Fransico Cronical
This puts about 1/2 of soul fully in range of artillary and the rest with a bit more elavation.
Sorry the article you quote is wrong. North Koreans have GRADS and 155 howitzers at best. They cannot reach Seoul. No way. Sorry
maps.google.com...
they would have to cross the DMZ.
[edit on 26-7-2009 by Spartak_FL]
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Defense Minister Kim Yong Chun issued the warning during a national meeting held on the eve of the anniversary of the armistice that ended the 1950-53 Korean War, the official Korean Central News Agency said.
"We will mercilessly and resolutely counter the enemy's sanctions with retaliation, its all-out war with all-out war," Kim told the meeting. "We will deal unimaginably deadly blows at the U.S. imperialists and the South Korean puppets if they ignite a war, obsessed with a foolish ambition."
Fox News
Originally posted by mrmonsoon
Defense Minister Kim Yong Chun issued the warning during a national meeting held on the eve of the anniversary of the armistice that ended the 1950-53 Korean War, the official Korean Central News Agency said.
"We will mercilessly and resolutely counter the enemy's sanctions with retaliation, its all-out war with all-out war," Kim told the meeting. "We will deal unimaginably deadly blows at the U.S. imperialists and the South Korean puppets if they ignite a war, obsessed with a foolish ambition."
In a separate dispatch, KCNA also denounced an upcoming military exercise between the U.S. and South Korea as aimed at invading the North. The planned maneuvers lay bear a "black-hearted aim lurking behind" their talk of "dialogue," it said.
How is this not a declaration of war? I am not for war, I am against it, but in a situation where a country's officials state they will deal "unimaginably deadly blows" to us, why is that not a war declaration?
I think it's time we did something about this little pest, before he does something to us.
Where are those snipers who solved that somalian pirate crisis?
Originally posted by genius/idoit
The scariest thing about Kim jong ill(whatever)is his hair cut (wig?) what a wuss if this guy threatened my sister she would beat his donkey.
Originally posted by argentus
Seems to me that Kim Yong Chun is taking a page from Iran's playbook.
I disagree that this is all "wind"; an enemy that has nothing to loose is very dangerous, as like the movie WarGames -- the only sound move is not to play.
Originally posted by MegaCurious
Originally posted by argentus
Seems to me that Kim Yong Chun is taking a page from Iran's playbook.
I disagree that this is all "wind"; an enemy that has nothing to loose is very dangerous, as like the movie WarGames -- the only sound move is not to play.
I don't see how North Korea is taking anything from Iran's playbook here. Iran has never threatened to attack anyone, only retaliation IF attacked, which is agreeable. I mean, I hope you don't expect them to just lie there and take it?
The other statement you might be thinking about has been challenged and Iran never mentioned attacking folks, nor have they ever attacked anyone.
I wonder how many posts in this thread can be traced back to Homeland Security? Hmmm...
Originally posted by masonwatcher
You also have plenty of 7/11 owners in the US of Korean descent so what do you know.