It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by Udontknowme
No one has ever debunked chemtrails, contrary to claims in this thread.
That never been proven, if I we4re going to posion someone, I would do it by spiking the water supply, much easier....especially if it were the water board doing it
Dry ice (which is solid carbon dioxide) is often used to flash freeze food, and silver iodide (a chemical sometimes used in antiseptics) has molecular structure very similar to that of ice, allowing the substance to induce freezing when introduced to clouds. Liquid nitrogen is a cryogenic fluid at around –320 degrees Fahrenheit that can cause rapid freezing on contact with living tissue, which is why it's sometimes used to remove skin lesions such as warts.
Cloud seeding, whether to induce or suppress precipitation, is anything but a precise science. "Attributing one storm to seeding is very difficult unless the cloud system is incredibly simple, like fog that has no chance of precipitation," Arlen Huggins, associate research scientist in the division of atmospheric sciences at the Desert Research Institute in Reno, Nev., explained in a February Scientific American "Ask the Experts" article.
Either way, Kottlowski points out, cloud seeding does not alter climate or affect weather systems. "It only works over a few dozen square miles," he says. "You can't keep away a major storm" such as a hurricane.
Originally posted by Darthswan
This is an interesting thread. It's funny to see the back and forth. If it was really happening, anyone "in the know" would know. So the speculation, the posting of links as support of an arguement, really doesn't mean anything. Secrecy is the key. I have taken numerous pictures of Condensation Trails and Chemical Trails. The Con-trails seem to dissapate over a period of time, the "Chem-trails" seem to last longer and they form Cirrus clouds.
On non-afterburning engines the nozzle is a fixed size because the differing atmospheric pressure over the operating altitudes makes little difference to the engine aerodynamics and variable nozzle use is expensive. However, the great range of mass flow rates an afterburning engine generates requires the use of variable nozzle diameters and shapes. Depending on the amount of afterburning, the variable nozzle may be simple or complex. Engines capable of supersonic flight have convergent-divergent duct features that generate supersonic flow. Engines that are required to generate thrust quickly, from idle, use a variable area propelling nozzle in its open configuration to keep thrust to a minimum while maintaining high engine rpm. When thrust is needed, initiating a go-around for example, it is simple and quick to close the nozzle to the high-thrust position.
Originally posted by cooler
hmmm another misguided chemtrail thread.
this chemtrail thread like all the chemtrail threads has produced zero evidence.
to support chemtrails.
i wonder why
Title : Change in the Intensity of Artificial Precipitation in Time with Frontal Cloud Modifications,
Corporate Author : FOREIGN TECHNOLOGY DIV WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OHIO
Personal Author(s) : Leskov,B. N.
Report Date : 11 JUL 1974
Pagination or Media Count : 19
Abstract : In the report primary attention is given to studying the radar parameters of trails of artificial precipitation obtained from one line of seeding. The investigations made it possible to draw a number of important conclusions for the procedure of isolating the areas of intensified precipitation on the earth's surface and for confirmation of the fact of an increase in precipitation itself.
Originally posted by Marrr
reply to post by weedwhacker
I live in the Midwestern U.S. By saying I see them all of the time, I'm not meaning day in or day out. But once or twice a week wouldn't be too outrageous of a claim. Have been fascinated with meteorology all of my life and have studied it a good part of my younger life. Spent alot of time looking up in the skies as well. Something that forms 25,000 ft plus in the air that spreads out slowly and descends to Earth as the day progress is something I wouldn't classify as jet exhaust. Twenty years ago, a contrail behind a jet that didn't disappear shortly after exhaustion would've been something that caught your eye. It did mine. Not saying that all jet exhaust is like this. I see MANY jets that have normal contrails behind them. Think of your car on a cold, Winters day. As you drive down the street, does the exhaust leaving your tailpipe form one bigasz contrail behind your vehicle, that slowly spreads out to many thousands of feet over time? No, it does not. While this may not be the most valid analogy, I've always liked it.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by Marrr]
Originally posted by deprogrammer
reply to post by Ferris.Bueller.II
Chemtrails are documented in U.S scientific legislation as an ongoing weather manipulation strategy. No fairy tale here!
Originally posted by Missing Blue Sky
Originally posted by Marrr
reply to post by weedwhacker
I live in the Midwestern U.S. By saying I see them all of the time, I'm not meaning day in or day out. But once or twice a week wouldn't be too outrageous of a claim. Have been fascinated with meteorology all of my life and have studied it a good part of my younger life. Spent alot of time looking up in the skies as well. Something that forms 25,000 ft plus in the air that spreads out slowly and descends to Earth as the day progress is something I wouldn't classify as jet exhaust. Twenty years ago, a contrail behind a jet that didn't disappear shortly after exhaustion would've been something that caught your eye. It did mine. Not saying that all jet exhaust is like this. I see MANY jets that have normal contrails behind them. Think of your car on a cold, Winters day. As you drive down the street, does the exhaust leaving your tailpipe form one bigasz contrail behind your vehicle, that slowly spreads out to many thousands of feet over time? No, it does not. While this may not be the most valid analogy, I've always liked it.
[edit on 25-7-2009 by Marrr]
I agree with you. I recently moved from Chicago to a place where there are few to no chemtrails and my health has improved exponentially in just 4 months. The Chemtrails in Chicago were killing me and many in my neighborhood. 2 people on my street had MS. Having abundant sunshine now has made my mood, health and everything a milllion times better.
or.. chicago is polluted and the pollution causes the sky to be over cast.
i think you have conformation bias
There is evidence that the ubiquitous cloud cover is causing severe vitamin D deficiencies in people especially children...who hardly ever get a sunny day anymore. My children have better grade, more energy and are healthier. The sun has dimmed 20% in the last decade, this is not a fantastical figment of our imagination...we are not stupid, the skies are being polluted by air craft contrails, deliberate or not, they are harmful to our health.www.youtube.com...discovermagazine.com...
[edit on 8/7/2009 by Missing Blue Sky]
or.. its the pollution from factories!
why is the first thing you think of is chemtrails? why not look into other sources?