Richard Gage delivers letter to NIST proving demolitions amid controversy?

Richard Gage is being detained at the National Institute for Standards and Technology, in Gaithersburg, MD. Mr. Gage went to deliver a letter to, Shyam Sunder which proves thermite was in the WTO buildings, they were detained and are currently inside, film was confiscated. We Are Change Virginia's Ben Schnitger is on the scene. NIST, 100 Bureau Dr, Gaithersburg - (301) 975-2000 Stay Tuned for additional info....

wearechange.org...

pilotsfor911truth.org...

Hold the Phones…Richard Gage WAS NOT Detained by NIST
Today at 3:15pm
July 20, 2009 Cheri M. Roberts – Producer, Unspun Newz

First thing Monday morning, 9/11 truth activist group We Are Change released a developing story regarding the possible detention of Richard Gage, AIA - founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, at the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).

UnSpun immediately made contact with Richard Gage, additional members of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth as well as NIST itself to clarify and or confirm the details of this incident.

NIST’s Press Officer, Michael Newman was kind enough to comment stating Richard Gage, AIA arrived at NIST’s Visitor Center where he was refused access to the building by guards due to his lack of an appointment. Gage arrived with a CD and letter for Dr. Shyam Sunder which he left with the guards at the front gate under their assurance said material would be delivered to Dr. Sunder as requested by Gage.

By 11:30am pacific time NIST’s Press Officer for Public Affairs, Michael Newman confirmed for UnSpun Newz that Richard Gage’s material had in fact been delivered directly to Dr. Sunder as promised.

We are Change member Ben Schnitger from Virginia was along and filming and initially broke this developing story on the We Are Change website. It was immediately reposted on multiple social networks across the world. UnSpun Newz would like to make the record clear as to what actually occurred.

According to their Press Officer, NIST guards initially confiscated Mr Schnitger’s footage, but it was later returned to him by NIST who according to Michael Newman there was no unlawful activity taking place.

umm, care to make an appointment next time, Richard? I guess the good news here is that 9/11 activism is alive and well! Eat it NIST!

[edit on Mon Jul 20th 2009 by TrueAmerican]

I don't get it,

title says he got detained, content says he wasn't

am I missing something ?

The "we are strange" movement can't get the facts strait, even when they witness it first hand. Thats FUNNY!

I'm sure the demonstration with the boxes really clinched it....

reply to post by thedman


You never know. NIST shot at spray-on fireproofing with a shot gun to try to establish what effect the jet impacts would have had. Sounds like just their kind of "science" to me.

reply to post by waypastvne


not nearly as funny as air accelerating out of a moving plane.

If any of this were true, we would see an update from AE911, or even
receive a notice via site newsletter. I'll let you know if anything arrives.
Their site has no update at this time.

masterful, it got my attention ... and he is there on our Request Gentalmen... one of the reasons he is at NIST is to get the 2Tb of WTC7 Data (their WebSite Model) that is stalled in their legal dept... and also another Model... both are stopped at NIST.



[edit on 20-7-2009 by BornPatriot]

Originally posted by BornPatriot
masterful,
one of the reasons he is at NIST is to get the 2Tb of WTC7 Data

[edit on 20-7-2009 by BornPatriot]

Did he forget to bring a cardbord box to put it in?

reply to post by waypastvne


Two - One Terabyte Hard Drives for a Computer .. and the Language is LS DYNA... check cashed Feb. 2009.

posted by BornPatriot
masterful, it got my attention ... and he is there on our Request Gentalmen... one of the reasons he is at NIST is to get the 2Tb of WTC7 Data (their WebSite Model) that is stalled in their legal dept... and also another Model... both are stopped at NIST.

Or at least the el cheapo NIST pseudoscientists could give AE their check back.

Their legal department must be sweating over the growing certainty that their collective necks might end up in a noose.

reply to post by bsbray11


Least NIST had reason - was to establish if debris striking the SFPM
(Sprayed on Fire Proof Material) would dislodge it from surface of
steel.

Tests found that the material had difficulty adhering to various surfaces -
if steel was dirty or rusted, also if steel was painted the SFPM could
be easily dislodged. Also found the air movement over time could
dislodge it.

reply to post by thedman


No, it was just as laughable as it sounds, it's just not so funny when it's coming from people YOU respect.

The fireproofing they were testing was only one kind of fireproofing present. There was also cementous waterproofing and some other types they didn't consider for falling away, which is one of the things that makes them idiots. Not to mention any fireproofing not hit by debris would be fine. Even what they shot at didn't come completely off, only part of it did. So bottom line is that they proved nothing important, except the obvious, that energetic debris hitting some of the spray-on fireproofing dislodged some of it.

Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by bsbray11

 

Least NIST had reason - was to establish if debris striking the SFPM
(Sprayed on Fire Proof Material) would dislodge it from surface of
steel.

Tests found that the material had difficulty adhering to various surfaces -
if steel was dirty or rusted, also if steel was painted the SFPM could
be easily dislodged. Also found the air movement over time could
dislodge it.

If this wasn`t an inside job, but, and it`s a huge but, it was down to many explosions as placed by terrorists especially regarding the `We are clueless as how to tower seven collapsed` and the whole evidence is screaming an explosive based controlled demolition, do you not find it somewhat uncomprehendable that there were no tests done re - explosive residues on steel etc?.