It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warrenb
has anyone actually bought the DVD?
Does it have more footage of the unexplained lights or is it just the same video that is floating around online?
Originally posted by warrenb
...I do look forward to seeing this 30,000 feet of footage, if it exists an if they ever digitize it.
Originally posted by skibtz
Originally posted by warrenb
...I do look forward to seeing this 30,000 feet of footage, if it exists an if they ever digitize it.
I look forward to hearing why she never used a digital camera instead insisting on using caveman technology (i.e. super8) even though she was filming these things as recently as 2005.
Too many alarm bells and not enough substance in this case...
Originally posted by Sam60
I choose a) when it comes to the orbs/dust......delusional
Come on people she is an 82 year old lady.... my grandma is 83 and she doesn't even know how to use a cell phone.. just because she doesn't use digital does not disprove anything. Regardless of what you say the film is still authentic and her credibility has been tested countless times. I think the fact that Dr. Jay Allen Hynek was involved with her says enough. If you don't know who he is, go google him. It may sway your opinions
Originally posted by warrenb
has anyone actually bought the DVD?
Does it have more footage of the unexplained lights or is it just the same video that is floating around online?
Originally posted by tmayhew01
.. just because she doesn't use digital does not disprove anything.
Originally posted by tmayhew01
I bought the dvd online from amazon's video on demand, same as the one at megaupload or whatever.... does anybody else have access to any of her other footage?
Originally posted by skibtz
Originally posted by warrenb
...I do look forward to seeing this 30,000 feet of footage, if it exists an if they ever digitize it.
I look forward to hearing why she never used a digital camera instead insisting on using caveman technology (i.e. super8) even though she was filming these things as recently as 2005.
Too many alarm bells and not enough substance in this case...
Originally posted by skibtz
You paid around $19 for her story and she didn't even provide you with the evidence?
More fool you.
Originally posted by alienesque
hi...thanks for that
didnt you find the UFO behind the kitchen window somewhat..erm..too perfect...staged?
oh...the orbs are pieces of dust..
by the way..someone mentioned that just because she wants to make some money from this doesnt mean its false...in my opinion it most definately does...beings who want to help us would not go to a woman who sells this information.
Originally posted by longfade
That's a very superficial judgment which shows that you really haven't read much about this. The fact that she's using "caveman" technology is what makes it so hard to debunk.
Originally posted by Odessy
your just being stubborn.
yes, it doesnt make ANY sense at all that an older woman would want to stick to using something she knows.
I say to you that it is the closed minding thinking of today that demands we use the latest and greatest technology, keeping us always buying and in "want" of new things.
Look through the eyes of this lady, why buy a digital camera when a) she doesnt know how to use one, and b) her super8 is working just fine!
want want want