New Info?

Anyone want to tackle this?

Very Interesting questions More questions, and this time some good questions.

Some have little interest in getting in the middle of the Obama birth issue, but Paul Hollrah over at FSM did so yesterday and believes the issue can be resolved by Obama answering one simple question.

What passport did he use when he was shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi ?

So how did a young man who arrived in New York in early June 1981, without the price of a hotel room in his pocket, suddenly come up with the price of a round-the-world trip just a month later? And once he was on a plane, shuttling between New York , Jakarta , and Karachi , what passport was he offering when he passed through Customs and Immigration

The American people not only deserve to have answers to these questions, they must have answers. It makes the debate over Obama's citizenship a rather short and simple one.


Q: Did he travel to Pakistan in 1981, at age 20?

A : Yes, by his own admission.

Q: What passport did he travel under?

A: There are only three possibilities. 1) He traveled with a U.S. Passport 2) He traveled with a British passport, or 3) He traveled with an Indonesia passport.

Q: Is it possible that Obama traveled with a U.S. Passport in 1981?

A: No. It is not possible. Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department's "no travel" list in
> 1981.
Conclusion: When Obama went to Pakistan in 1981 he was traveling either with
A: British passport or an Indonesian passport. If he were travel with a British passport that would provide proof that he was born in Kenya on August 4, 1961, not in Hawaii as he claims. And if he were traveling with an Indonesian passport that would tend to prove that he relinquished whatever previous citizenship he held, British
or American, prior to being adopted by his Indonesian step-father in 1967. Whatever the truth of the matter,the American people need to know how he managed to become a "natural born" American citizen between 1981 and 2008..

Given the destructive nature of his plans for America , as illustrated by his speech before Congress and the disastrous spending plan he had presented to Congress, the sooner we learn the truth of all this, the better.

reply to post by 22-250


I subscribed to this thread anticipating a lively debate. You bring up an interesting point and I am anxious to hear a rebuttal.

In other words *bump*

However I feel the debate is moot due to the fact that the Government's authority is no longer derived constitutionally but martially. It seems recently there is an effort to make us very aware of this fact.