It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ChemBreather
What I am waiting for now is : SKYNET ..
Originally posted by fleetlord
Plus, how many people do you know of who walk around wearing all-organic clothing? Will a simple watch, necklace, bracelet, or brass button cause the inner-workings to jam? Soldiers on a battlefield will definetly have some inorganic material on their person. How about artificial limbs or replacement hips or gold teeth? If EATR can't eat anything inorganic, does that mean it will be reduced to carefully picking and choosing what it consumes? Perhaps it will be a vegetarian.
Originally posted by Wildbob77
Upcoming Military Robot Could Feed on Dead Bodies
www.foxnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
A Maryland company under contract to the Pentagon is working on a steam-powered robot that would fuel itself by gobbling up whatever organic material it can find — grass, wood, old furniture, even dead bodies.
Originally posted by Discotech
Originally posted by ChemBreather
What I am waiting for now is : SKYNET ..
Skynet has existed for quite some time, also military
en.wikipedia.org...(satellites)
I like this thread just for the fact it brings the paranoia brigade out on show.
Question: If the soldiers are dead, how is it any different to being used as donors or towards medical science ? Also if it eats our enemies who would have us dead, how is eating them (alive preferably, just to teach them the error of their ways) a bad thing ?
I for one welcome our Lean Mean Killing Machines, I wonder if they'll include a George Foreman Grill as standard
Originally posted by mr-lizard
And people wonder why 'terrorists' hate your 'freedom'...
Originally posted by jsobecky
I remember the scenes of them dragging the bodies of those contractors in Iraq, and then hanging them from a bridge.
Originally posted by Discotech
Question: If the soldiers are dead, how is it any different to being used as donors or towards medical science ? Also if it eats our enemies who would have us dead, how is eating them (alive preferably, just to teach them the error of their ways) a bad thing ?
Originally posted by jsobecky
I remember the scenes of them dragging the bodies of those contractors in Iraq, and then hanging them from a bridge.
Originally posted by yellowcard
Originally posted by mr-lizardThe creator(s) of this monstrosity should be tried for crimes against humanity, this is nothing short of horrifying.
This is such a ridiculous statement, just because it was designed to power itself on organic material doesn't mean it was specifically designed to feed on dead bodies. It would be a boring headline if they didn't add in "dead bodied"...geez, use your head, or did the robot get to you already
[edit on 14-7-2009 by yellowcard]
Originally posted by Ridhya
That is COMPLETELY different I can see you are CLEARLY not a warrior. Ja. Try picturing it against YOU. Well you want them dead, so when you come across it devouring your friend and using his chemical energy to kill you maybe you'd change your mind.